Whether prohibiting the broadcast of all kinds of advertisement is a boon to the public or not is said to be a subject of interest and debate. This notion seems to be affirmed mainly on account of the fact that advertising would increase consumerism in addition to induce children.
Advertising companies appears to manipulate people’s minds inasmuch as they, most of the times, utilize catchy and flashy slogans so as to generate more revenue for themselves. Although, in some cases, people might benefit from introducing new goods they had taken no notice of, these corporations tend to give an exaggerated account of the redeeming features of their product to stimulate desires of general populace who may not need that at all. Such enticement would escalate consumerism in the society, the ultimate result of which is exerting financial pressure especially on less aflluent strata.
The efficacy of preventing promotions of all kind to be spred is evident when it comes to modern approaches of marketing that are targeting the younger population. When youngsters see a temping advertisement in TV, they often pester their parents to puchase the stuff, without being mindful of its potetial danger. A case in point could be Coca-Cola company that have broadcasted childish adverts recently in order to decieve children, which have completely adverse effects on the children’s growth process due to the amount of sugar and other addative substances the drink contains. As a result, the physical wellness of the young individuals will be at risk if they achieve what they desire, and only when they are ignored by the parents, will they face emotional and mental hardship.
To encapsulate, it is conceivable that putting a ban on advertising is of highly beneficial practicality. This is due to the fact that not only can it take control of consumerism, but this measure could safeguard children from health threats.