Every country has their own defense forces for the safety of the public. The majority of individuals firmly believe that the earth becomes a safe place for citizens; therefore, authorities should not need to invest in military arm services. I partially agree with the given notion and discuss its significance.
To commence with, some people argue that lawmakers need to spend on troops due to several factors. The first and foremost reason behind this is that still in today’s time, there are threats of battle due to competition; consequently, the government will always be prepared for that kind of situation. Moreover, in the contemporary era, human chaos leads to corruption, and illegal activities are increasing day by day, which is not only unsafe for communities but also stops the development of the nation. Also, human activities such as pollution, burning of fossil fuel, and so on bring out natural disasters like tsunamis and earthquakes; as a result, in emergency situations, military force plays a vital role.
However, others claim that the world today is a safer place and the administration should avoid spending enormous amounts of funds in their armed force because of numerous aspects. First, many other responsibilities of the government, namely, education, healthcare, infrastructure, etc., and as a direct consequence, advancement of the country. Additionally, lawmakers ought to manage funds in every sector. To explicate it, the government spends necessary amounts of capital on troops rather than investing large amount of money. For instance, Australia pays out limited funds in every sector for the stability of the economy.
In conclusion, the administration should lay out money in the military force due to human chaos, natural disaster, and so on. At the same time, instead of spending an enormous level of capital, authorities spend limited money by making proper arrangements.
