Nowadays, living in different countries is a preference for many people. Individuals choose to work and study in developed nations. However, others concern about illegal migration and require striction of obtaining free entrance to their countries. In this essay, I will give advancements and explain disadvatages.
On the one side, social attitudes and concepts are primary factors of moving to abroad. For example, people in Africa are tend to move to European countries such France, Portugal and Spain for more better education and jobs opportunities. The primary reason is that many African countries were colonial territories of these named nations. Inevitably, African immigrants do not face with the cultural shock and the language barrier. Conversely, citizens of developed countries such as Canada, Australia or Germany want to relocate to some Asian destinations. Low-cost living remains the simple answer of their choices. For example, many older people from Australia decide to live in Vietnam for exploring new culture. At the same time, German citizens state that the prices of real estate in Asia are significantly cheaper than in their homeland.
On the other side, illegal migration is the serious dialemma of many governments including the United States of America, Japan, or the United Kingdom. For instance, British citizens claim that they have to compete with immigrants whether in labour market or at universities. Also, free entrance can threaten to national security. There were so many attacts to America by terrorists.
In conclusion, I show respect towards individualism in term of living in different countries. Diversity in culture becomes a unavoidable factor in our world because in the future will be more multinational companies and corporates.