It is obvious that the criminal rate has been escalating during the years which is considered as a sociable problem. Conviction capital punishment is a debatable topic amongst the people, some citizens believe that the death penalty should exist to restrict the amount of felons, otherwise, other people ought to convict the criminals to alternative sentences are necessary.
On the one hand, the advocates of the death penalty say that it is a paramount deterrent to commit a crime and severe punishment would significantly impact an individual’s decision-making. Furthermore, facing the serious consequences for heinous crimes, resulting in to drop in the growth of major crimes. Saudi Arabia is a particular example to illustrate the impact of enforcing capital punishment in society, authority is capable of controlling the occurrence of terrorist attacks and making a tranquil country.
On the other hand, the opponents believe that the government should implement other solutions to constrain major crimes. They uphold the sanctity of life, so as to give life’s rights to anyone regardless of what they doing, moreover, insisting that no one has the authority to take another’s life. serving life imprisonment would be the best replacement for capital punishment. according to numerical reports, annually some of the convicted criminals are considered innocent people. As much as the amount of executed prisoners saw an increase, the violent culture and encourage revenge would rise.
In conclusion, I am firmly inclined to believe that serving a life sentence would be an acceptable and reasonable choice to give the opportunity to innocent people who condemned to death penalty by mistake.