Nowadays, many people think independent countries should welcome more foreigners who are escaping their own countries and give them food and accommodations. This essay totally disagree that statement however, accepting emigrants are completely tolerated action to human rights, amount of asylum seekers are accepted that makes possible to influence immunity of nations and it makes faction of religious.
To welcome a large number of foreigners who have different values, languages, customs and cultures is too risky for developed countries. There are several reasons why it is harmful for indigenous such as if foreigners number equal or approach to third of indigenous number, it influences their mother language and their own cultural things, for example traditional celebrations. In other words, it makes globalization more rapidly. This essay strongly believes every nation should maintain their difference between other nations or deglobalization. I want to specialize in Norway because they accept only 5% emigrants each year and they demand most disciplines to study the Norwegian language for foreign students who want to study in Norway’s universities.
Tons of migrants are able to fight off religion. That means the world has 4 main religions and a lot of people who believe different values. It has the potential to create from little debate to more significant trouble that is war of religion. For example, the 21st century human beings all know about the war between Israel and Palestinian that causes a lot of meaningless deaths especially their 65-70% woman and young childs. It seems too tragic. On the other hand, Norwegians have better experience than other nations because they do not admit islamic religious people to avoid any wars.
In conclusion, for the first countries, welcoming migrants to their own nation and supplying them to necessary needs is legally perfect action but it still has cons such as tensions between different religions and getting fast globalization issues.