The ongoing debate regarding the significance of historical monuments presents two distinct perspectives
On one hand, the reason why I think historical monuments are regarded as treasures is that these materials can be educational resources, especially for children. In Japan, there are many historical sites, and the most distinctive one is the Atomic Bomb Dome. This building remains to tell the tragic event of war, which leads to no positive effect, and not only domestic people but also a significant number of foreigners visit there. By visiting these kinds of buildings, many people can have a greater impression than by just looking at pictures; they are worth preserving.
On the other hand, why historical sites are considered irrelevant is that it costs a lot to maintain them. Some monuments have undergone many reconstructions because of deterioration, and during the construction, visitors are prohibited from entering. This money can be used in other ways to tackle urgent social problems. Moreover, some cities have issued a law stating that people who live in these areas are not allowed to build any tall buildings in order to protect the scenery, and this prevents the cities from developing.
In my opinion, while historical monuments undoubtedly offer educational value, a balanced approach must be adopted. It is essential to find a middle ground that honors our past while also addressing the needs and aspirations of the present.