There is no denying that violent crimes have significantly grown in frequency in recent years. While many people think the death penalty is not the best way to stop this
violence, in my opinion, it is very essential.
First and foremost, offenders must fear the
repercussions of their behavior. This is significant because for many people, the dread of dying might be overwhelming and incite them to think about their act. Even watching another individual go through the experience makes them reluctant to continue. For instance, Saudi Arabia maintains stringent penalties for violent crimes like murder and rape, which is why the country’s crime rate is so low. As a result, knowing they may be executed for their crimes may deter someone
from doing them in the first place.Opponents, on the other hand, assert that there is no solid evidence that the death
sentence serves as a deterrent. The rate of violent crimes, including murder, hasn’t changed considerably in those nations where the death penalty hasn’t been abolished yet.
The death penalty, in opponents’ view, is neither a cause nor a remedy for a culture of violence. You can’t anticipate that two wrongs can make a right since retribution is merely another term for revenge. They also think that supporters downplay the crucial reality that wrongful sentencing might result in the deaths of innocent individuals.
In conclusion, the government should focus more on excellent citizens than on inmates
who have hurt society. A violent criminal should not be kept alive. These people should be excluded as quickly as possible to deter others with similar goals.