There is no denying that there has been a significant increase in the frequency of violent crimes in recent years. While some individuals may argue that the death penalty is not the most effective way to address this issue, I firmly believe that it is indispensable.
Above all, it is crucial for offenders to be apprehensive about the consequences of their actions. This is significant because, for many individuals, the fear of death can be overwhelming and may lead them to reconsider their actions. Witnessing someone else go through the experience can also dissuade them from continuing down a violent path. For example, Saudi Arabia maintains stringent penalties for violent crimes such as murder and rape, leading to a notably low crime rate in the country. Consequently, the apprehension of facing execution for their crimes may deter individuals from committing them in the first place.
Conversely, opponents argue that there is insufficient evidence to support the notion that the death penalty serves as a deterrent. They point out that the rate of violent crimes, including murder, has not significantly decreased in nations where the death penalty remains in force. From their perspective, the death penalty neither addresses the root causes of a culture of violence, nor does it provide a solution. They argue that seeking retribution is merely seeking revenge, and they emphasize the critical issue that wrongful convictions could result in the deaths of innocent individuals.
In conclusion, the government should prioritize law-abiding citizens over incarcerated individuals who have harmed society. It is my firm belief that violent criminals should not be allowed to continue their existence. Instead, swift measures should be taken to exclude them in order to deter others with similar intentions.