It is a common assumption, as mandated by the law and accepted by society, that all individuals who have disobeyed the law should serve time behind bars. However, many argue there are more sensible and ethical ways to redeem those with less severe crimes. I agree with the second view, as I believe certain people should be allowed leeway and be given the opportunity to do good for the community.
Most lawbreakers are catergorized as criminals, or those who actively bring harm to others. The prison system is a highly regarded practical form of punishment, as these criminals are housed away from the majority of society and therefore leave no chances for continued disruption. Criminals are stripped of privileges they would normally have in the outside world. Prison is also a core function of the judicial body of multiple governments in the world, and is the first option for political leaders or police forces when dealing with lawbreakers. Therefore, it is natural for many people to think prison as the most suitable choice for all individuals that don’t abide with the laws.
However, other people believe those who committed minor crimes deserve repentence and redemption, as they are not on the same level as individuals with more dangerous issues. An easy alternative to gain favor is by helping out the locals with work like running a business, cleaning up public places, or doing charity. Not only will it benefit the general community, but after their serving time is up opportunities will be available to them to restart life as a member of said community. I believe this is an appropriate choice to be offered for minor lawbreakers, with a siginificantly more positive outcome than being behind bars.
While prison may be the first choice with its functionality and practicality, I recommend lending a hand to those who may not deserve the form of brutal justice prison encourages, and instead making them become a form of support for the local economy and society, opening future paths to a new life.