It is controversial that raising the minimum age that capable of legal driving or riding will undermine the traffic incidents and improve road security. As far as I am concerned, policy should not fully be encouraged despite having it owns defences.
On the one hand, older legal drivers and riders may positively impacted on social commuting. What I mean is when the government make the age group of traffic particpants, fewer accidents may happen. It is because people with longer life-experience may have a better consciousness of road safety than the younger generations, who are regared as more stubborn, ensthusiatic and less concerned about the injuries. Therefore, increasing the minimum age for legal non-walking road users may foster the road safety.
On the other hand, I believe that traffic security may be optimized without abandoning younger drivers and riders. By raising awareness of the younf people about the risks of commiting in crimes while communting in public and motivating them about the meaning of their lives, nations are able to restrict transport security. Besides that, establishing pratical regulatutions can also help adress this issue. For instance, younger peolple with the proper perspective on road security may also obey the on-road law as well as the older one. Furthermore, accidents recorded recently have showed that behaviors when taking part in traffic is not closely relevant to the age of the accused.
To conclude, while increasing the mimnimum legal age for using transports such as cars or motorbikes may possibly to foster road safety; however, I assume that on-road safeness can be upgraded by other approaches without undermining the range of residents.
In conclusion, I see excessive treats do not worth being abadoning but adressing with prisoners should also tries more positive approches and weighing the level of crimes thjey made to bring the proper regulations.