Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings. Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development, because this land would be better used for housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Almost all of the major cities of the world are burdened with the large influx of people from nearby suburbs creating challenges for accommodating them in its scarce land. For tackling the situation, expanding the city areas may offer a viable and effective solution to this far-reaching problem. To begin with, expanding the city areas […]

Many urban cities are struggling with housing crises as they have the shortage of land for new building construction. However, some local governments believed that the issue could be solved by utilizing park land for residential areas, moreover, this land would be beneficial used for housing. I strongly oppose the suggestion of reassigning park area […]

Recently different urban centers started to experience a lack of area for building. Some members of local government argue that the possible solution could be found by reallocating public land such as parks to construct new buildings for residents. While I acknowledge the urgent need for housing, I disagree that getting rid of parklands is […]

While some local goverments argue that housing crisis could be solved by reassigning park land for residential buildings, I strongly believe that green open space more crucial issue nowadays. This essay will explain why people should disagree with this statement and support that we have to keep green area like park land to cope with […]