Many environmentalists would argue that the more proportion of financial collections ought to be sinked into the preservation of vulnerable creatures and plants while other individuals consider that providing such kind of species with superior financial support amy cause to lose our money.In my opinion, I partly agree for investing more money for them and I disagree with this viewpoint for the reason that it is a wasteful.
On the one hand, discovering new areas for these species is the crucial factor for them to live without any dangers.In other words, if rare creatures occupy in safe areas, these areas could protect them other dangerous creatures and also poachers,For example, the majority of birds suffer from the lack of sustenance and as a result, this issue can be the main factor for starvation and in turn, they consume more fish in lakes and this can cause to reduce global fish consumption around the world.But, undiscovered territories can be solution for such kind of issues.
On the other hand, putting our investments into saving rare creatures and plants does not waste our money.Because of this,by investing money for protecting them, we can gain extra income on this business and also we can contribute to the development of tourism rate between countries. As we can improve our tourism rate by protecting wildlife.
To conclude, while preserving rare species is possible to be unnecessary practice, I would argue that this practice can lead to the improvement in prevention of extinction and developing globetrotting.
