It is true that in many individuals are dilemma about whether those students should be fined who do not complete the course appears to be better or alternative sources. However, from my perspective, students do not complete course students should be fined is evidently a better option for most of them and the prime Reasons that lie in my stance are cited following ways.
On the me hand, there are definite beneficials aspects of having s preference for should be fined who do not complete the course and thus it ought to be given the maximum priority. chief of them includes waste public resource which Can be regarded as the most compeling for endorsing. With the prevalance of such a facility, not only it helps to preserve our economy but students can build better career as well.Moreover, consider negative impact on univercites for opting for should be find who do not complete course no is way negligible, which is why it seems to be the most effective way too decrease proportion of education with that in mind, people are becoming increasingly interested in do not complete course.
On the other hand, opponents who are in favore of alternative sources are benefited in some way too. out of them, the merit occours to me is definitely to find better alternative University,low tuituin fee
is probably the best example to make it more clear. Is it feasible to reap the same facility to its counterpart? the answer is obviously no,due to lack of proper guidence, It has never been possible indeed. There is, However, no doubt that people advocate alternative Sources are likely to have personal freedom, resulting in make more creativity.
To conclusion, both who do not complete Course should be fined and alternative Sources have their Own advantages, and the decision ultimately depends on individuals preferences and needs. Therefore, I universally believe that neither is better than the other.