The number of serious crimes, homicides and criminal commits is increasing. Even though a some individuals believe that the greatest reason to reduce crimes and recidivism would be to use death penalty as a punishment, but other group of people say that other measures are required to reduce criminals, including me.
Nowadays, the quantity of criminal commits, internet steals is rapidly increasing in whole world, and especially in undeveloped countries. The reasons why a few individuals commit mugging and crimes in the internet are to take an extended sum from an easier way. Therefore, the government required to reduce criminal commits be death penalty, some people could say. This measure actually can have a great result, because a lot of offenders will think about committing crime or homicide, otherwise the judge will commit a sentence about a death penalty. Therefore, this solution can have an enormous decline of offenders and the quantity of victims will decrease, too.
On the other hand, an extended number of people believe that the death penalty is not solution for punishing offenders, including me. Because nobody can decide about other people’s lives, despite this criminal may commit a homicide and for my opinion life sentence will be more humane than death. Moreover, from my perspective this solution will be more terrible for offenders, because incarceration in prison for all life is more hard punishment. In addition, for more horrible effect for offenders can be a deprivation of property.
In conclusion, an expanded number of people are of the opinion that the solution to reduce crimes and decrease the quantity of victims is death penalty. However, on the other hand a lot of population have another point of view, including me. If criminals commit a seriously crime or homicide, they required to be incarcerated in prisons for all life and deprivation of property.