Environment has always been a topic of debate on the global scale, so there is a burgeoning sentiment that an international organization should be established to tackle the world environment-related issues. I concur with this suggestion to a certain extent.
On one hand, it is undeniable that an multinational entity is more capable to exert powerful strategies resolving immediate or pressing environmental priorities than a national organisation. Ostensibly, it is the collaboration among an array of countries which ensures the long-term and efficacious outcomes. For instance, the intervention of developed countries is likely to contribute greatly in the urgent environmental degradation occurring across third world countries, as they can send professionals or consultants with an aim to provide their pragmatic initiatives to such developing nations.
On the other hand, there stands a high chance that conflicts emerge among countries involved due to disagreement in solutions. Indeed, every country has its own immediate problems, and demonstrates attitudes towards a specific phenomenon, resulting in incompatible approaches. Additionally, a unfair pattern ensues owing to the fact that some countries are not willing to allocate their financial resources which are utilized to redress the other countries.
In conclusion, the question of whether an international organisation should be founded or not is hard to answer due to its nuanced duality; therefore, striking for a balance between unity and diversity among participants is paramount to warrant a smooth collaboration between countries.My