Multiple Graphs

Band 7+: The charts below show the qualifications of staff in an advertising company in 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The charts below show the qualifications of staff in an advertising company in 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image presents two pie charts detailing qualifications within an advertising company comparing the years 1990 and 2010; in 1990, Ph.D.-Art represents 2%, Ph.D.-Science constitutes 5%, Master-Art accounts for 20%, Master-Science comprises 20%, First Degree-Art occupies 15%, and First Degree-Science holds 38%; in 2010, Ph.D.-Art is 3%, Ph.D.-Science makes up 9%, Master-Art sees an increase to 25%, Master-Science declines to 20%, First Degree-Art drops to 10%, while First Degree-Science reduces significantly to 33%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

In general, the most noticeable difference between the two years is the shift from a higher proportion of staff with qualifications in the “Art” fields to those in “Science.” Additionally, there is a slight overall increase in the number of highly qualified staff members over the 20-year period.

In 1990, the largest proportion of staff had a Master’s degree in Art (30%), followed by those with a First Degree in Art (25%). A considerable percentage of employees also held a Master’s degree in Science (20%), and the remaining staff were split between qualifications in Ph.D.-Art (10%), Ph.D.-Science (5%), and First Degree-Science (10%).

By 2010, the distribution had changed. The proportion of staff with a First Degree in Science and a Master’s degree in Science both rose significantly, reaching 25% and 30%, respectively. Meanwhile, those with qualifications in Art, including First Degree-Art and Master-Art, decreased to 20% and 15%, respectively. Staff with Ph.D.-Art qualifications remained relatively stable at 10%, but there was a noticeable increase in the percentage of employees with Ph.D.-Science qualifications, which rose to 10% in 2010.

Overall, the trends suggest a growing emphasis on qualifications in Science-related fields in 2010 compared to 1990, while the proportion of employees in the Art fields decreased over the two decades.

Word Count: 209

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B1 - Intermediate
Using more sophisticated words could be beneficial.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

staff: 6

qualifications: 6

degree: 5

proportion: 4

first: 4

fields: 3

those: 3

master's: 3

employees: 3

science: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report identifies some main features and makes some comparisons, but there are inaccuracies in the data reported. For example, the report states that in 1990, the largest proportion of staff had a Master's degree in Art (30%), followed by those with a First Degree in Art (25%). The correct values are 20% and 15% respectively. Also, the report states that in 1990, the remaining staff were split between qualifications in Ph.D.-Art (10%), Ph.D.-Science (5%), and First Degree-Science (10%). The correct values are 2%, 5% and 38% respectively. Similarly, the report states that by 2010, the proportion of staff with a First Degree in Science and a Master's degree in Science both rose significantly, reaching 25% and 30%, respectively. The correct values are 33% and 20% respectively. Also, the report states that meanwhile, those with qualifications in Art, including First Degree-Art and Master-Art, decreased to 20% and 15%, respectively. The correct values are 10% and 25% respectively. Finally, the report states that Staff with Ph.D.-Art qualifications remained relatively stable at 10%, but there was a noticeable increase in the percentage of employees with Ph.D.-Science qualifications, which rose to 10% in 2010. The correct values are 3% and 9% respectively. To improve, ensure that the data reported is accurate.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report is generally well-organized and easy to follow. The introduction and overview provide a clear sense of the report's purpose. Paragraphing is logical, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the data. Transitions between paragraphs are smooth, contributing to the overall coherence of the report. However, there is room for improvement in terms of cohesion. While the report uses cohesive devices effectively, there are instances where the connections between ideas could be strengthened. For example, in the second paragraph, the transition from the overall proportion of staff with a Master's degree in Art to those with a First Degree in Art could be smoother. Similarly, in the third paragraph, the shift from discussing the increase in staff with a First Degree in Science and a Master's degree in Science to the decrease in those with qualifications in Art could be more seamless. By paying closer attention to these transitions, the report could achieve an even higher level of coherence and cohesion.

Lexical Resource

The report demonstrates a good range of vocabulary and uses it accurately and appropriately. There is evidence of an attempt to use more sophisticated language, such as "noticeable difference" and "considerable percentage." However, there is room for improvement in terms of lexical resource. While the vocabulary is generally accurate, there are instances where it could be more precise or nuanced. For example, the phrase "rose significantly" is used multiple times, which could be varied for greater impact. Similarly, the term "split between" could be replaced with a more descriptive phrase. By expanding the range of vocabulary and using it with greater precision, the report could achieve an even higher level of lexical resource. Pay attention to vocabulary repetition to improve the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report demonstrates a wide range of grammatical structures and uses them with full flexibility and control. There are no noticeable grammatical errors or punctuation mistakes. The sentences are well-constructed and varied in length and complexity, contributing to the overall readability of the report. The report consistently uses correct grammar and punctuation throughout.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the qualifications of staff in an advertising company in 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pictures below illustrate the staff’s level of professionality in an advertisement company during 1990 and 2010. Overall,the information indicates the shifts in the proportions during the two decades, particularly in the categories of first degree-art and ph.D-science. In 1990, master-science faculty was considered as the predominant category, represented 29% of total per centage among […]

Band 5+

The charts below show the qualifications of staff in an advertising company in 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie graph compares the academic degree that the staff of an advertising company have earned over two separate years 1990 and 2010. Overall, during the span of 20 years the employees who got Master degrees were still the biggest proportions of the company structure, yet the witnessed upward trend could be seen in the […]

Band 6+

See All

The table shows the average annual income of people working in different sectors in 2004 , and the change from 2003. The pie chart shows the distribution of graduates in the different sectors.

The given table compares the average salary in six different sectors ,in 2004, and the changes after a year. The pie chart shows the ratio of graduates who work at different proffesion sectors. Overall, people who worked at the public services had the highest income, while agriculture workers got the lowest salary. In addition, wholesale […]

Band 5+

Mixed graphs. Summarize the information by selecting key information and make comparison where relevant.

The provided visual data encompasses a pie chart and a table illustrating the demographic composition of Australia by nationality and the distribution of these nationalities between urban and rural locales. It is evident that Australians constitute the predominant nationality, while Dutch individuals represent the minimal segment. Additionally, a significant disparity exists in the residency of […]

Band 9

Task 1: The pie charts show the proportion of users across different age groups on three apps:Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate the distribution of users across distinct age groups on three platforms (Facebook, Twitter and YouTube). Overall, the vast majority of users on all the given applications mainly consists of individuals from 18-34 and 35-49 age groups. It is also noticeable that Twitter has the highest concentration of younger adults aged 18-34, […]

Band 9

Writing task 1 The graph below shows the viewership of different TV programs among three different age groups. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart illustrates the comparison of data about 5 different TV programs that are watched by 3 age groups. Overall, it is clear that cartoons and sports are very popular among younges, while the reverse was true for older viewers. It is also worth mentioning that TV shows proportion remained relatively unchanged. Looking at […]

Band 6+

See All

Band 7+: The charts below show the qualifications of staff in an advertising company in 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the qualifications of staff in an advertising company in 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the qualifications of staff in an advertising company in 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Other Topics:

The table shows the average annual income of people working in different sectors in 2004 , and the change from 2003. The pie chart shows the distribution of graduates in the different sectors.

Mixed graphs. Summarize the information by selecting key information and make comparison where relevant.

The charts show survey results concerning why MBA graduates chose their degree, and employer's reasons for hiring them. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts show survey results concerning why MBA graduates chose their degree, and employer's reasons for hiring them. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Task 1: The pie charts show the proportion of users across different age groups on three apps:Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Writing task 1 The graph below shows the viewership of different TV programs among three different age groups. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium