There is an ongoing debate about whether the growing number of adolescents involved in crime might be a consequence of pressure in social media. I believe that social platforms can amplify conflicts and encourage dangerous behaviors for online viewers. A relevant way to tackle these issues is media regulation.
Violent media strongly influences how teenagers behave, what decisions they make. Connection between content-makers and viewers is strong, as the person becomes addicted to what he or she often sees. Specifically, a large number of teenagers tend to imitiate unlawful behavior, which leads to unexpected situations such as violent offences, fraud, and assault. Even though nothing is happening to a person in videos, in real life it creates serious problems with imprisonment. For instance, 70-80% of youth under 18 account for about 10% of all crimes caused by online platforms.
A practical solution that can be taken towards is strict social media control. As the levels of criminal activities are overwhelmingly increasing, parents and governments should limit exposure to social media. Age restrictions and content warning can simply warn individuals about problems related to crime. Moreover, short videos about illegal acts should be shown in every Youtube video, in school meetings by teachers and counselors, and mainly, by police officers. These measures have a significant contribution to reduce the detrimental effect of illicit deals. Hence, chances to protect people from issues will be significantly higher.
In conclusion, it is thought by many people that the main cause of juvenile crime is the influence of social media. By agreeing with the reason that it has ramifications such as imprisonment and assaults, it can be mitigated by age restrictions in online platforms.