In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food. Many people think that it is good to eat traditional food while others believe that fast food is a good choice.
People have long been divided over whether eating fast food or traditional food is better. While both perspectives hold considerable merit, this essay will examine each viewpoint before ultimately asserting that traditional food cannot be replaced.
On the one hand, advocates that fast food from other countries have been becoming trends in many regions of the world such as fried chicken, burger, and pizza. This perspective stems from the fact that the swiftness and the convenience of this type of food, in some countries we can easily order on mobile phone or drive-thru then they could get their orders in just 2 to 5 minutes.
On the other hand, traditional food plays a significant role in the national cuisine and culture, so people should preserve these types of food. Moreover, some dishes may be healthier than fast food, and in some countries the price of fast food is expensive, no it won’t truly be appropriate for both price and taste. In addition , traditional food is varied, so we have many different dishes to choose from instead of the simple menu of fast food. F
In conclusion, although both are to some degree, I firmly subscribe to the notion that traditional food is the better choice. This is chiefly due to consumer health, because fast food is not good health in all cases. People should balances between eating traditional food and fast food, since we should change our menu to avoid boredom.