Band 4+: The table below gives information about the daily cost of water per person in five different countries. (Figures are based on the minimum daily requirement per peron of 11.5 litres.) Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The report addresses the task and identifies some main trends, but it struggles with clarity, accuracy in comparisons, and grammatical precision. While the main idea (Tanzania being the most expensive and the US being the cheapest) is present, the presentation of data is often confusing. For example, the comparison between Pakistan and the US is phrased in a way that is difficult to follow, and the description of the UK's position is somewhat vague. To improve, focus on the following: 1. **Data Accuracy and Clarity**: Ensure that when you compare two countries, the relationship is mathematically and logically clear. Avoid phrases like 'is significantly higher at water price rather than US', which are grammatically incorrect. 2. **Structure**: Avoid using an 'All in all' conclusion that simply repeats the overview. In Task 1, you only need one overview (usually after the introduction) to summarize the main trends. A concluding sentence that adds no new information is redundant. 3. **Grammar and Vocabulary**: Work on subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'its price make up' should be 'its price makes up') and the use of articles. Instead of using informal terms like 'value of liquid' or 'costliness', use more academic terms such as 'the cost of water' or 'the most expensive country'. 4. **Grouping Information**: Instead of listing countries one by one, try to group them (e.g., grouping the high-cost African nations together and the low-cost developed nations together) to create a more cohesive comparison.

The organization of the report is somewhat logical, but the progression of ideas is hindered by awkward phrasing and repetitive structures. The use of cohesive devices (e.g., 'Moreover', 'In contrast') is present, but they do not always connect ideas smoothly due to grammatical inaccuracies. To improve, focus on using more varied linking words and ensure that each paragraph has a clear, singular purpose. Avoid using 'All in all' for a conclusion in Task 1; instead, use the overview paragraph to summarize the main trends.

The vocabulary is limited and often used incorrectly, which occasionally obscures meaning. For example, phrases like 'value of liquid', 'costliness is in Tanzania', and 'compose of low price' are unnatural and imprecise. You should aim to use more academic and specific terminology related to data description, such as 'expenditure', 'proportion', 'minimal', or 'substantial'. Avoid using overly simplistic or vague words like 'liquid' when referring to 'water'.

There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the report, including issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'its price make up'), article usage, and sentence structure. Some sentences are fragmented or poorly constructed, making them difficult to follow (e.g., 'Pakistan is significantly higher at water price rather than US''). Work on mastering basic sentence structures and ensuring that comparisons are grammatically sound (e.g., 'The cost in Pakistan is significantly higher than in the US').