It is argued that the authority ought to focus on residential developments for rising population, rather than renovating existing outdated buildings. I definitely agree on this belief, since in modern cities functionality and growth should be prioritized. However, some old buildings are irreplaceable cultural assets, that cannot be demolished.
To start with, nowadays, cities become crammed with an ever-increasing number of people, therefore, the expansion of residential buildings and the enhanced infrastructure are vital approaches, to mitigate this issue. For instance, high rise residential buildings are invaluable dwellings, because they may accommodate an enormous number of citizens. Furthermore, a developed transport system, for example, might help alleviate the problem of congestion, caused by exceeding number of cars.
Despite the fact, that outdated properties represent the cultural identity, government attempts to maintain them are still considered to be irrelevant. The reason for such opinion is that older buildings occupy a lot of valuable urban space, what therefore prevent cities from the expanding. Consequently, the vast number of derelict buildings should be demolished or converted into new housing and other basic systems. For instance, an ancient house may become a restaurant, which improves the infrastructure as well as maintains culture features.
In conclusion, there are plenty of ideas that support the belief that government should pay attention on building new housing more than on renovating already existing dwellings. These are, for instance, exceeding number of people, settling down in all districts, as well as an inefficient occupation of city’s space.