Some people believe that more important to create beautiful cities than efficient. In my opinion, I disagree with the notion that creating visually stunning cities outweighs the importance of their functionality. However, I also believe that cities ought to be pleasing to the eye. In my view, cities should strike a balance – being both practical and visibly appealing.
One obvious advantage of aesthetically pleasing cities, especially those with heritage sites and places of historic significance, is their ability to attract tourists from different countries. Moreover, the influx of visitors drawn to beautiful cities can really (quite) boost their economy, contributing its growth and prosperity. This, in turn, proves beneficial for local residents by improving living conditions and enhancing community well-being. Furthermore, an eye-catching urban environment increases community pride and overall satisfaction among the inhabitants of those cities.
However, in my point of view, being only beautiful and attractive is not enough for cities to survive. While a strong and efficient infrastructure is fundamental for urban thriving. It’s crucial for well-developed cities ensures an affordable and sustainable housing for their citizens. Accesible public transportation provides good everyday commuting for people. Furthermore, green parks and recreational areas within urban landscapes holds significant importance, not just for their aesthetic value, but for the tangible health benefits they provide. Well-built infrastructure not only enhances the quality of life for residents but also supports economic growth and resilience.
In conclusion, although an aesthetic appearance of cities may be impressing, the functionality is playing the essential role.