🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!

Animal Minds: Parrot Alex - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations

From IELTS Past Papers Academic Reading Test 32 · Part 1 · Questions 1–13

Reading Passage

Animal minds: Parrot Alex

A In 1977 Irene Pepperberg, a recent graduate of Harvard University, did something very bold. At a time when animals still were considered automatons, she set out to find what was on another creature's mind by talking to it. She brought a one-year-old African gray parrot she named Alex into her lab to teach him to reproduce the sounds of the English language. "I thought if he learned to communicate, I could ask him questions about how he sees the world."

B When Pepperberg began her dialogue with Alex, who died last September at the age of 31, many scientists believed animals were incapable of any thought. They were simply machines, robots programmed to react to stimuli but lacking the ability to think or feel. Any pet owner would disagree. We see the love in our dogs' eyes and know that, of course, they have thoughts and emotions. But such claims remain highly controversial. Gut instinct is not science, and it is all too easy to project human thoughts and feelings onto another creature. How, then, does a scientist prove that an animal is capable of thinking—that it is able to acquire information about the world and act on it? "That's why I started my studies with Alex," Pepperberg said. They were seated—she at her desk, he on top of his cage—in her lab, a windowless room about the size of a boxcar, at Brandeis University. Newspapers lined the floor; baskets of bright toys were stacked on the shelves. They were clearly a team—and because of their work, the notion that animals can think is no longer so fanciful.

C Certain skills are considered key signs of higher mental abilities: good memory, a grasp of grammar and symbols, self-awareness, understanding others' motives, imitating others, and being creative. Bit by bit, in ingenious experiments, researchers have documented these talents in other species, gradually chipping away at what we thought made human beings distinctive while offering a glimpse of where our own abilities came from. Scrub jays know that other jays are thieves and that stashed food can spoil; sheep can recognize faces; chimpanzees use a variety of tools to probe termite mounds and even use weapons to hunt small mammals; dolphins can imitate human postures; the archerfish, which stuns insects with a sudden blast of water, can learn how to aim its squirt simply by watching an experienced fish perform the task. And Alex the parrot turned out to be a surprisingly good talker.

D Thirty years after the Alex studies began; Pepperberg and a changing collection of assistants were still giving him English lessons. The humans, along with two younger parrots, also served as Alex's flock, providing the social input all parrots crave. Like any flock, this one —as small as it was—had its share of drama. Alex dominated his fellow parrots, acted huffy at times around Pepperberg, tolerated the other female humans, and fell to pieces over a male assistant who dropped by for a visit. Pepperberg bought Alex in a Chicago pet store where she let the store's assistant pick him out because she didn't want other scientists saying later that she'd particularly chosen an especially smart bird for her work. Given that Alex's brain was the size of a shelled walnut, most researchers thought Pepperberg's interspecies communication study would be futile.

E "Some people actually called me crazy for trying this," she said. "Scientists thought that chimpanzees were better subjects, although, of course, chimps can't speak." Chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas have been taught to use sign language and symbols to communicate with us, often with impressive results. The bonobo Kanzi, for instance, carries his symbol-communication board with him so he can "talk" to his human researchers, and he has invented combinations of symbols to express his thoughts. Nevertheless, this is not the same thing as having an animal look up at you, open his mouth, and speak. Under Pepperberg's patient tutelage, Alex learned how to use his vocal tract to imitate almost 100 English words, including the sounds for various foods, although he calls an apple a "banerry." "Apples taste a little bit like bananas to him, and they look a little bit like cherries, so Alex made up that word for them," Pepperberg said.

F It sounded a bit mad, the idea of a bird having lessons to practice, and willingly doing it. But after listening to and observing Alex, it was difficult to argue with Pepperberg's explanation for his behaviors. She wasn't handing him treats for the repetitious work or rapping him on the claws to make him say the sounds. "He has to hear the words over and over before he can correctly imitate them," Pepperberg said, after pronouncing "seven" for Alex a good dozen times in a row. "I'm not trying to see if Alex can learn a human language," she added. "That's never been the point. My plan always was to use his imitative skills to get a better understanding of avian cognition."

G In other words, because Alex was able to produce a close approximation of the sounds of some English words, Pepperberg could ask him questions about a bird's basic understanding of the world. She couldn't ask him what he was thinking about, but she could ask him about his knowledge of numbers, shapes, and colors. To demonstrate, Pepperberg carried Alex on her arm to a tall wooden perch in the middle of the room. She then retrieved a green key and a small green cup from a basket on a shelf. She held up the two items to Alex's eye. "What's same?" she asked. Without hesitation, Alex's beak opened: "Color." "What's different?" Pepperberg asked. "Shape," Alex said. His voice had the digitized sound of a cartoon character. Since parrots lack lips (another reason it was difficult for Alex to pronounce some sounds, such as ba), the words seemed to come from the air around him, as if a ventriloquist were speaking. But the words—and what can only be called the thoughts—were entirely his.

H For the next 20 minutes, Alex ran through his tests, distinguishing colors, shapes, sizes, and materials (wool versus wood versus metal). He did some simple arithmetic, such as counting the yellow toy blocks among a pile of mixed hues. And, then, as if to offer final proof of the mind inside his bird's brain, Alex spoke up. "Talk clearly!" he commanded, when one of the younger birds Pepperberg was also teaching talked with wrong pronunciation. "Talk clearly!" "Don't be a smart aleck," Pepperberg said, shaking her head at him. "He knows all this, and he gets bored, so he interrupts the others, or he gives the wrong answer just to be obstinate. At this stage, he's like a teenager; he's moody, and I'm never sure what he'll do."

Questions

Questions 1–6 True / False / Not Given

Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1? Write

TRUE if the statement is true

FALSE if the statement is false

NOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage

1 Firstly, Alex has grasped quite a lot of vocabulary.
2 At the beginning of study, Alex felt frightened in the presence of humans.
3 Previously, many scientists realized that animals possess the ability of thinking.
4 It has taken a long time before people get to know cognition existing in animals.
5 As Alex could approximately imitate the sounds of English words, he was capable of roughly answering Irene's questions regarding the world.
6 By breaking in other parrots as well as producing the incorrect answers, he tried to be focused.

Questions 7–10 Summary Completion

Complete the following summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage, using no more than two words from the Reading Passage for each answer.

After the framing of Irene, Parrot Alex can use his vocal tract to pronounce nearly 7, while other scientists believe that animals have no this advanced ability of thinking, they would rather teach 8. Pepperberg clarified that she wanted to conduct a study concerning 9 but not to teach him to talk. The store's assistant picked out a bird at random for her for the sake of avoiding other scientists saying that the bird is 10 afterwards.

Questions 11–13 Short Answers

Answer the questions below.

Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.

11 What did Alex reply regarding the similarity of the subjects showed to him?
12 What is the problem of the young parrots except Alex?
13 To some extent, through the way he behaved what we can call him?

Answers & Explanations Summary

# Answer Evidence Explanation
Q1 NOT GIVEN Under Pepperberg's patient tutelage, Alex learned how to use his vocal tract to imitate almost one hundred English words, including the sounds for various foods, although he calls an apple a "banerry." Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that Alex learned to say nearly 100 English words, but it does not say that learning a lot of words was something he did first.
Answer Explanation:
The answer "NOT GIVEN" means that the text does not provide enough information to say whether the statement is true or false.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the passage states that Alex learned "almost one hundred English words," it never mentions whether grasping a large vocabulary happened "firstly" in the process or sequence of his studies. Since this specific information is missing from the text, the statement cannot be confirmed as TRUE or FALSE.
Q2 NOT GIVEN She brought a one-year-old African gray parrot she named Alex into her lab to teach him to reproduce the sounds of the English language Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage states that Pepperberg brought the parrot Alex into her laboratory to begin teaching him, but it contains no details about whether Alex felt afraid of humans.
Answer Explanation:
The answer choice "NOT GIVEN" means that the text does not mention whether Alex was scared around people when the research started.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the passage discusses the beginning of the study—such as Irene Pepperberg buying Alex from a pet store and bringing him to her lab—it never mentions his feelings, specifically whether he felt frightened in the presence of humans.
Q3 FALSE When Pepperberg began her dialogue with Alex, who died last September at the age of 31, many scientists believed animals were incapable of any thought Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that when the researcher started her work, many scientists thought animals could not have any thoughts at all.
Answer Explanation:
The answer FALSE means the statement contradicts or goes against what the passage says.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is FALSE because the passage explicitly states that in the past, many scientists believed animals were not able to think at all, viewing them as machines or robots without thoughts. The statement claims that scientists previously knew animals could think, which is the exact opposite of the passage.
Q4 TRUE Bit by bit, in ingenious experiments, researchers have documented these talents in other species, gradually chipping away at what we thought made human beings distinctive while offering a glimpse of where our own abilities came from Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that scientists discovered mental abilities in different animal species slowly over time ("Bit by bit" and "gradually"), showing that it took a long time to understand animal minds.
Answer Explanation:
The answer "TRUE" means that the passage confirms that it took many years and slow, step-by-step scientific work for humans to realize that animals are capable of thinking.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is TRUE because the passage explains that discovering animal intelligence did not happen all at once. In Paragraph C, the author notes that researchers revealed these abilities "Bit by bit" and "gradually," which shows that learning about animal thinking took a long period of time and slow progress. In addition, the passage describes how 30 years of study were required to change the traditional view that animals were merely mindless robots.
Q5 TRUE In other words, because Alex was able to produce a close approximation of the sounds of some English words, Pepperberg could ask him questions about a bird's basic understanding of the world Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that since Alex could say words closely resembling English, Pepperberg was able to ask him questions to learn about how he viewed the world.
Answer Explanation:
The answer "TRUE" means that the statement accurately reflects the facts stated in the text.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is TRUE because Paragraph G clearly explains that Alex could make sounds very close to English words, which allowed Irene Pepperberg to ask him questions and get answers about how a bird understands the world (such as questions about shapes, colors, and numbers). This matches the statement directly, confirming it as true.
Q6 FALSE He knows all this, and he gets bored, so he interrupts the others, or he gives the wrong answer just to be obstinate Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that Alex already knew all the information and felt bored, which caused him to cut in while others were speaking and give incorrect answers on purpose to be stubborn.
Answer Explanation:
The answer FALSE means the statement contradicts the information in the passage.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is FALSE because the passage explicitly states that Alex interrupted other birds and gave wrong answers because he was bored and acting stubborn ("obstinate"), not because he was trying to concentrate or be focused. In the text, "interrupts the others" corresponds to "breaking in other parrots", and "gives the wrong answer" corresponds to "producing the incorrect answers".
Q7 100 English words Under Pepperberg's patient tutelage, Alex learned how to use his vocal tract to imitate almost 100 English words, including the sounds for various foods, although he calls an apple a "banerry." Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that through patient teaching, the parrot Alex learned to use his vocal tract to copy and say nearly one hundred words in English.
Answer Explanation:
The answer refers to roughly a century of vocabulary terms in English that the parrot was able to say.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is supported by Paragraph E, which explains what Alex achieved under Irene Pepperberg's training. The text states that Alex learned how to use his vocal tract to copy and produce nearly "one hundred English words".
Q8 chimpanzees "Scientists thought that chimpanzees were better subjects, although, of course, chimps can't speak." Chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas have been taught to use sign language and symbols to communicate with us, often with impressive results Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that other scientists preferred to work with and teach chimpanzees instead of birds, training them to communicate using signs and symbols.
Answer Explanation:
The answer refers to apes called chimpanzees, which other scientists believed were better animals to study and teach.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is supported by Paragraph E, which notes that other scientists thought chimpanzees made better study subjects than parrots. The text explains that researchers had taught chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas to use sign language and symbols for communication.
Q9 avian cognition "I'm not trying to see if Alex can learn a human language," she added. "That's never been the point. My plan always was to use his imitative skills to get a better understanding of avian cognition." Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage states that Pepperberg's main goal was not to make the parrot learn human language, but to better understand how birds think and understand things (avian cognition).
Answer Explanation:
The answer "avian cognition" means the thinking, learning, and mental processes of birds.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is "avian cognition" because in Paragraph F, Irene Pepperberg explains the true goal of her research. She makes it clear that she was not simply trying to teach Alex human language, but rather wanted to use his ability to copy sounds to learn more about how birds' minds work ("avian cognition").
Q10 particularly chosen / chosen Pepperberg bought Alex in a Chicago pet store where she let the store's assistant pick him out because she didn't want other scientists saying later that she'd particularly chosen an especially smart bird for her work Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that Irene bought Alex at a pet shop and asked the worker to choose the parrot. She did this so other scientists could not say later that she had intentionally selected an unusually smart bird.
Answer Explanation:
The answer "particularly chosen" means selected on purpose or specifically picked out.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is supported by paragraph D, which explains why Irene Pepperberg let the pet shop assistant select Alex for her. She did this to prevent other researchers from claiming later on that she had purposefully picked out a bird that was exceptionally intelligent.
Q11 color / colour She held up the two items to Alex's eye. "What's same?" she asked. Without hesitation, Alex's beak opened: "Color." Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that when the researcher showed two things to Alex and asked what was the same about them, Alex answered with the word "Color."
Answer Explanation:
The answer means that Alex said the word "color" when asked what feature was the same between two objects.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is supported by Paragraph G. The passage explains that Irene Pepperberg held up two green items (a key and a cup) and asked Alex, "What's same?" (which refers to their similarity). Alex immediately answered by saying "Color." Therefore, "color" is the exact reply Alex gave.
Q12 wrong pronunciation "Talk clearly!" he commanded, when one of the younger birds Pepperberg was also teaching talked with wrong pronunciation Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage states that Alex told one of the younger birds being trained by Pepperberg to speak clearly because it said words with incorrect pronunciation.
Answer Explanation:
The answer means that the younger birds made mistakes when speaking words and could not say them correctly.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is found in Paragraph H. The text mentions that while Pepperberg was teaching other younger birds, one of them had an issue with its speech. Specifically, Alex told the bird to "Talk clearly!" because it spoke with "wrong pronunciation."
Q13 a teenager / teenager At this stage, he's like a teenager; he's moody, and I'm never sure what he'll do Excerpt/Passage Explanation:
The passage explains that Alex acts moody and unpredictable, just like a teenager.
Answer Explanation:
The answer means a young person who is between 13 and 19 years old.
Reason For Correctness:
The correct answer is supported by the end of Paragraph H, where Pepperberg explains Alex's mood swings, boredom, and stubborn behavior. She compares him directly to a young person by stating, "At this stage, he's like a teenager; he's moody, and I'm never sure what he'll do."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.