New Agriculture In Oregon, US - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Past Papers Academic Reading Test 04 · Part 1 · Questions 1–13
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on the Reading Passage below.
New Agriculture in Oregon, US
A. Onion growers in eastern Oregon are adopting a system that saves water and keeps topsoil in place, while producing the highest quality "super colossal" onions. Pear growers in southern Oregon have reduced their use of some of the most toxic pesticides by up to two-thirds, and are still producing top-quality pears. Range managers throughout the state have controlled the poisonous weed tansy ragwort with insect predators and saved the Oregon livestock industry up to $4.8 million a year.
B. These are some of the results Oregon growers have achieved in collaboration with Oregon State University (OSU) researchers as they test new farming methods including integrated pest management (IPM). Nationwide, however, IFM has not delivered results comparable to those in Oregon. A recent U.S General Accounting Office (GAO) report indicates that while integrated pest management can result in dramatically reduced pesticide use, the federal government has been lacking in effectively promoting that goal and implementing IPM. Farmers also blame the government for not making the new options of pest management attractive. "Wholesale changes in the way that farmers control the pests on their farms is an expensive business." Tony Brown, of the National Farmers Association says. "If the farmers are given tax breaks to offset the expenditure, then they would willingly accept the new practices." The report goes on to note that even though the use of the riskiest pesticides has declined nationwide, they still make up more than 40 percent of all pesticides used today; and national pesticide use has risen by 40 million kilograms since 1992. "Our food supply remains the safest and highest quality on Earth but we continue to overdose our farmland with powerful and toxic pesticides and to under-use the safe and effective alternatives," charged Patrick Leahy, who commissioned the report. Green action groups disagree about the safety issue. "There is no way that habitual consumption of foodstuffs grown using toxic chemicals of the nature found on today's farms can be healthy for consumers," noted Bill Bowler, spokesman for Green Action, one of many lobbyists interested in this issue.
C. The GAO report singles out Oregon's apple and pear producers who have used the new IPM techniques with growing success. Although Oregon is clearly ahead of the nation, scientists at OSU are taking the Government Accounting Office criticisms seriously. "We must continue to develop effective alternative practices that will reduce environmental hazards and produce high quality products," said Paul Jepson, a professor of entomology at OSU and new director of
D. OSU's Integrated Plant Protection Centre (IPPC). The IPPC brings together scientists from OSU's Agricultural Experiment Station, OSU Extension service, the u.s. Department of Agriculture and Oregon farmers to help develop agricultural systems that will save water and soil, and reduce pesticides. In response to the GAO report, the Centre is putting even more emphasis on integrating research and farming practices to improve Oregon agriculture environmentally and economically.
E. "The GAO report criticizes agencies for not clearly communicating the goals of IPM," said Jepson. "Our challenge is to greatly improve the communication to and from growers, to learn what works and what doesn't. The work coming from OSU researchers must be adopted in the field and not simply languish in scientific journals."
F. In Oregon, growers and scientists are working together to instigate new practices. For example, a few years ago scientists at OSU's Malheur Experiment Station began testing a new drip irrigation system to replace old ditches that wasted water and washed soil and fertilizer into streams. The new system cut water and fertilizer use by half, kept topsoil in place and protected water quality.
G. In addition, the new system produced crops of very large onions, rated "super colossal" and highly valued by the restaurant industry and food processors. Art Pimms, one of the researchers at Malheur comments: "Growers are finding that when they adopt more environmentally benign practices, they can have excellent results. The new practices benefit the environment and give the growers their success."
H. OSU researchers in Malheur next tested straw mulch and found that it successfully held soil in place and kept the ground moist with less irrigation. In addition, and unexpectedly, the scientists found that the mulched soil created a home for beneficial beetles and spiders that prey on onion thrips - a notorious pest in commercial onion fields - a discovery that could reduce the need for pesticides. "I would never have believed that we could replace the artificial pest controls that we had before and still keep our good results," commented Steve Black, a commercial onion farmer in Oregon, "but instead we have actually surpassed expectations."
I. OSU researchers throughout the state have been working to reduce dependence on broad spectrum chemical sprays that are toxic to many kind of organisms, including humans. "Consumers are rightly putting more and more pressure on the industry to change its reliance on chemical pesticides, but they still want a picture-perfect product," said Rick Hilton, entomologist at OSU's Southern Oregon Research and Extension Centre, where researchers help pear growers reduce the need for highly toxic pesticides. Picture perfect pears are an important product in Oregon and traditionally they have required lots of chemicals. In recent years, the industry has faced stiff competition from overseas producers, so any new methods that growers adopt must make sense economically as well as environmentally. Hilton is testing a growth regulator that interferes with the molting of codling moth larvae. Another study used pheromone dispensers to disrupt codling moth mating. These and other methods of integrated pest management have allowed pear growers to reduce their use of organophosphates by two-thirds and reduce all other synthetic pesticides by even more and still produce top-quality pears. These and other studies around the state are part of the effort of the IPPC to find alternative farming practices that benefit both the economy and the environment.
Questions
Questions 1–8 Matching Features
Use the information in the passage to match the people (listed A-G) with opinions or deeds below.
NB you may use any letter more than once
A. Tony Brown
B. Patrick Leahy
C. Bill Bowler
D. Paul Jepson
E. Art Pimms
F. Steve Black
G. Rick Hilton
Questions 9–13 Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
YES if the statement is true
NO if the statement is false
NOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | E | Art Pimms, one of the researchers at Malheur comments: "Growers are finding that when they adopt more environmentally benign practices, they can have excellent results. The new practices benefit the environment and give the growers their success." | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows Art Pimms saying that when farmers use safer, greener methods, they get two benefits: it helps nature and it helps the farmers get great results. Answer Explanation: The answer E refers to Art Pimms. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is E because Art Pimms explains two clear advantages (a double-advantage) of using the new farming methods. He states that these methods help the environment (first advantage) and also bring success to the farmers (second advantage). Keywords like "benefit the environment" and "give the growers their success" match the idea of a double-advantage. |
| Q2 | D | "We must continue to develop effective alternative practices that will reduce environmental hazards and produce high quality products," said Paul Jepson, a professor of entomology at OSU and new director of | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows Paul Jepson saying that researchers need to keep creating better farming methods. This confirms that the job of making these new techniques is still going on. Answer Explanation: The answer corresponds to Paul Jepson, who is listed as option D. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because Paul Jepson states that they "must continue to develop effective alternative practices." This shows that the work on creating these new methods is ongoing and not yet complete. Keywords like "continue to develop" match the idea that the work is "not finished." |
| Q3 | C | "There is no way that habitual consumption of foodstuffs grown using toxic chemicals of the nature found on today's farms can be healthy for consumers," noted Bill Bowler, spokesman for Green Action, one of many lobbyists interested in this issue | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Bill Bowler, a representative for Green Action, believes that regularly eating food grown with poisonous chemicals is not healthy for people. Answer Explanation: The answer choice C refers to Bill Bowler. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because Bill Bowler states that eating food grown with harmful chemicals cannot be good for a person's health. In the passage, the phrase 'habitual consumption of foodstuffs grown using toxic chemicals' means eating food produced with chemicals, and saying it cannot 'be healthy for consumers' means it is dangerous to health. |
| Q4 | A | "Wholesale changes in the way that farmers control the pests on their farms is an expensive business." Tony Brown, of the National Farmers Association says | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows Tony Brown saying that making big changes to how farmers deal with pests costs a lot of money. Answer Explanation: The answer is option A, which refers to Tony Brown. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because Tony Brown states that changing how farmers control pests is an 'expensive business'. This directly matches the idea that changing current farming methods to a new system costs a lot of money (it is not cheap). Keywords like 'expensive business' mean 'not a cheap process'. |
| Q5 | F | "I would never have believed that we could replace the artificial pest controls that we had before and still keep our good results," commented Steve Black, a commercial onion farmer in Oregon, "but instead we have actually surpassed expectations." | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Steve Black was surprised by the success of the new methods, stating that they actually beat what was expected. Answer Explanation: The answer is Steve Black (person F). Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is F because Steve Black mentioned that the outcomes were better than what anyone expected. In his comment, the phrase "surpassed expectations" directly matches the idea of results exceeding the anticipated goal. |
| Q6 | D | The work coming from OSU researchers must be adopted in the field and not simply languish in scientific journals | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that study results from scientists should be actively used on real farms rather than just remaining inside science magazines. Answer Explanation: The answer is D, which refers to Paul Jepson. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because Paul Jepson states that scientific research made by university experts must be used directly by farmers on their land ('adopted in the field') instead of just staying unread in scientific papers ('languish in scientific journals'). This matches the idea that research needs to be put into real practice. |
| Q7 | B | "Our food supply remains the safest and highest quality on Earth but we continue to overdose our farmland with powerful and toxic pesticides and to under-use the safe and effective alternatives," charged Patrick Leahy, who commissioned the report | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows Patrick Leahy stating that the food in the U.S. is still the safest and best in quality on Earth. Answer Explanation: The answer B refers to Patrick Leahy. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because Patrick Leahy says that the food supply in the United States is the safest and of the highest quality in the world. The phrase "safest and highest quality on Earth" matches the statement that the U.S. produces the best food in the world today. |
| Q8 | G | "Consumers are rightly putting more and more pressure on the industry to change its reliance on chemical pesticides, but they still want a picture-perfect product," said Rick Hilton, entomologist at OSU's Southern Oregon Research and Extension Centre, where researchers help pear growers reduce the need for highly toxic pesticides | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that, according to Rick Hilton, buyers are asking farms to use fewer chemicals, but they still demand that the fruit looks perfect. Answer Explanation: The answer G refers to Rick Hilton. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is G because Rick Hilton explains how the expectations of buyers impact agricultural farming. He notes that consumers (the end users) want crops grown with fewer harmful chemicals, yet they still expect a "picture-perfect product." This shows that customer demands directly affect how crops are produced. |
| Q9 | NO | Nationwide, however, IFM has not delivered results comparable to those in Oregon | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that across the entire country (nationwide), Integrated Pest Management has failed to bring good results similar to those seen in the state of Oregon. Answer Explanation: The answer NO means that the statement contradicts the information given in the passage. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the passage explains that across the country (nationwide), Integrated Pest Management has not produced good results like it did in Oregon. A government report also noted that the national government has not successfully promoted or used this system throughout the United States. Therefore, it has not been generally viewed as a success across the US. |
| Q10 | YES | The GAO report singles out Oregon's apple and pear producers who have used the new IPM techniques with growing success | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage clearly states that a official report pointed out the apple and pear growers in Oregon as positive examples of using IPM methods with great success. Answer Explanation: The answer YES means that the statement agrees with the information in the reading text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the text mentions that a official government report specifically highlighted ("singles out") the apple and pear farmers in Oregon for using the new Integrated Pest Management (IPM) methods with increasing success. |
| Q11 | NO | The IPPC brings together scientists from OSU's Agricultural Experiment Station, OSU Extension service, the u.s. Department of Agriculture and Oregon farmers to help develop agricultural systems that will save water and soil, and reduce pesticides | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the IPPC gets its scientists and members from local Oregon groups and the United States government, not from worldwide organizations. Answer Explanation: The answer is NO because the statement contradicts the information in the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the IPPC brings together scientists from American and local state organizations (such as Oregon State University and the U.S. Department of Agriculture), rather than organizations from around the world (globally). Keywords like 'scientists from OSU', 'u.s. Department of Agriculture', and 'Oregon farmers' show that the group consists of national and local members, not global ones. |
| Q12 | YES | OSU researchers in Malheur next tested straw mulch and found that it successfully held soil in place and kept the ground moist with less irrigation. In addition, and unexpectedly, the scientists found that the mulched soil created a home for beneficial beetles and spiders that prey on onion thrips - a notorious pest in commercial onion fields - a discovery that could reduce the need for pesticides | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that when researchers tested straw mulch, they unexpectedly found an extra good result: the mulch created a home for helpful spiders and beetles that eat crop pests, reducing the need for chemical sprays. Answer Explanation: The answer YES means that the statement agrees with the information in the reading passage. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the passage states that during the straw mulch tests, scientists found something good that was not expected. Specifically, the word "unexpectedly" shows that the extra benefit—creating a habitat for helpful insects that eat crop pests—was unplanned. |
| Q13 | NOT GIVEN | Picture perfect pears are an important product in Oregon and traditionally they have required lots of chemicals. In recent years, the industry has faced stiff competition from overseas producers, so any new methods that growers adopt must make sense economically as well as environmentally | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that pear farmers face heavy competition from overseas sellers, but it never mentions whether apple farmers face foreign competition as well. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the text mentions that pear growers face strong competition from foreign producers, it does not mention whether the apple industry is facing competition from abroad. |
