Science In Space - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Official Cambridge Guide to IELTS Academic Reading Test 5 · Part 3 · Questions 27–40
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27–40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
Science in Space
How will NASA transform the International Space Station from a building site into a cutting-edge research laboratory?
A premier, world-class laboratory in low Earth orbit. That was how the National Aeronautics and Space Administration agency (NASA) sold the International Space Station (ISS) to the US Congress in 2001. Today no one can doubt the agency's technological ambition. The most complex engineering project ever attempted has created an enormous set of interlinked modules that orbits the planet at more than 27,000 kilometres per hour. It might be travelling fast but, say critics, as a lab it is going nowhere. So far, it has gone through $150 billion.
So where should its future priorities lie? This question was addressed at the recent 1st annual ISS research and development conference in Colorado. Among the presenters was Satoshi Iwase of Aichi Medical University in Japan who has spent several years developing an experiment that could help solve one of the key problems that humans will face in space: keeping our bodies healthy in weightlessness. One thing that physiologists have learned is that without gravity our bodies begin to lose strength, leaving astronauts with weakened bones, muscles and cardiovascular systems. To counter these effects on a long-duration mission to, say, Mars, astronauts will almost certainly need to create their own artificial gravity. This is where Iwase comes in. He leads a team designing a centrifuge for humans. In their preliminary design, an astronaut is strapped into the seat of a machine that resembles an exercise bike. Pedalling provides a workout for the astronaut's muscles and cardiovascular system, but it also causes the seat to rotate vertically around a central axis so the rider experiences artificial gravity while exercising.
The centrifuge project highlights the station's potential as a research lab. Similar machines have flown in space aboard NASA's shuttles, but they couldn't be tested for long enough to prove whether they were effective. It's been calculated that to properly assess a centrifuge's impact on human physiology, astronauts would have to ride it for 30 minutes a day for at least two months. 'The only way to test this is in weightlessness, and the only time we have to do that is on the space station,' says Laurence Young, a space medicine expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
There are certainly plenty of ideas for other experiments: but many projects have yet to fly. Even if the centrifuge project gets the green light, it will have to wait another five years before the station's crew can take a spin. Lengthy delays like this are one of the key challenges for NASA, according to an April 2011 report from the US National Academy of Sciences. Its authors said they were 'deeply concerned' about the state of NASA's science research, and made a number of recommendations. Besides suggesting that the agency reduces the time between approving experiments and sending them into space, it also recommended setting clearer research priorities.
NASA has already begun to take action, hiring management consultants ProOrbis to develop a plan to cut through the bureaucracy. And Congress also directed NASA to hire an independent organisation, the Centre for the Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS), to help manage the station's US lab facilities. One of CASIS's roles is to convince public and private investors that science on the station is worth the spend because judged solely by the number of papers published, the ISS certainly seems poor value: research on the station has generated about 3,100 papers since 1998. The Hubble Space Telescope, meanwhile, has produced more than 11,300 papers in just over 20 years, yet it cost less than one-tenth of the price of the space station.
Yet Mark Uhran, assistant associate administrator for the ISS, refutes the criticism that the station hasn't done any useful research. He points to progress made on a salmonella vaccine, for example. To get the ISS research back on track, CASIS has examined more than 100 previous microgravity experiments to identify promising research themes. From this, it has opted to focus on life science and medical research, and recently called for proposals for experiments on muscle wasting, osteoporosis and the immune system. The organisation also maintains that the ISS should be used to develop products with commercial application and to test those that are either close to or already on the market. Investment from outside organisations is vital, says Uhran, and a balance between academic and commercial research will help attract this.
The station needs to attract cutting-edge research, yet many scientists seem to have little idea what goes on aboard it. Jeanne DiFrancesco at ProOrbis conducted more than 200 interviews with people from organisations with potential interests in low gravity studies. Some were aware of the ISS but they didn't know what's going on up there, she says. 'Others know there's science, but they don't know what kind.'
According to Alan Stern, planetary scientist, the biggest public relations boost for the ISS may come from the privately funded space flight industry. Companies like SpaceX could help NASA and its partners when it comes to resupplying the ISS, as it suggests it can reduce launch costs by two-thirds. Virgin Atlantic's SpaceShipTwo or Zero2Infinity's high-altitude balloon could also boost the space station's fortunes. They might not come close to the ISS's orbit, yet Stern believes they will revolutionise the way we, the public, see space. Soon everyone will be dreaming of interplanetary travel again, he predicts. More importantly, scientists are already queuing for seats on these low-gravity space-flight services so they can collect data during a few minutes of weightlessness. This demand for low-cost space flight could eventually lead to a service running on a more frequent basis, giving researchers the chance to test their ideas before submitting a proposal for experiments on the ISS. Getting flight experience should help them win a slot on the station, says Stern.
Questions
Questions 27–30 Multiple Choice (One Answer)
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Questions 31–35 Matching Features
Look at the following opinions and the list of people below.
Match each opinion with the correct person, A, B, C or D.
NB You may use any letter more than once.
A. Laurence Young
B. Authors of the US National Academy of Sciences report
C. Mark Uhran
D. Jeanne DiFrancesco
Questions 36–39 Summary Completion
Complete the summary using the lists of words, A–H, below.
Write the correct letter, A–H.
A. safe | B. competitive | C. flexible
D. real | E. rapid | F. regular
G. suitable | H. economical
The influence of commercial space flight on the ISS
According to Alan Stern, private space companies could affect the future of the ISS. He believes they could change its image; firstly because sending food and equipment there would be more 36 if a commercial craft were used, and secondly, because commercial flights might make the whole idea of space exploration seem 37 to ordinary people. Another point is that as the demand for space flights increases, there is a chance of them becoming more 38. And by working on a commercial flight first, scientists would be more 39 if an ISS position came up.
Questions 40–40 Multiple Choice (One Answer)
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q27 | B | Today no one can doubt the agency's technological ambition. The most complex engineering project ever attempted has created an enormous set of interlinked modules that orbits the planet at more than 27,000 kilometres per hour | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the space station is the hardest project people have ever tried to build and that it shows how much NASA wanted to achieve with new technology. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the International Space Station (ISS) is a very impressive example of what humans can create using advanced science and building skills. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the writer describes the station as the most difficult building project ever tried. By calling it the 'most complex engineering project ever attempted,' the writer shows that it is a huge achievement in technology. The text also mentions that 'no one can doubt' the high level of technology and goals involved in making it. |
| Q28 | A | In their preliminary design, an astronaut is strapped into the seat of a machine that resembles an exercise bike | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the early version of the machine is built so that a person sits in it and uses it in a way that looks very similar to using a bicycle for exercise. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the machine built by Satoshi Iwase is modeled after a standard piece of gym equipment: an exercise bike. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because the text explicitly describes the machine's appearance and function by comparing it to an exercise bike. It mentions that an astronaut sits in a seat and pedals, which provides a workout for the muscles and heart, just like conventional exercise equipment found on Earth. The keywords 'resembles' and 'exercise bike' directly support the idea that the design is based on familiar gym tools. |
| Q29 | B | One of CASIS's roles is to convince public and private investors that science on the station is worth the spend because judged solely by the number of papers published, the ISS certainly seems poor value: research on the station has generated about 3,100 papers since 1998. The Hubble Space Telescope, meanwhile, has produced more than 11,300 papers in just over 20 years, yet it cost less than one-tenth of the price of the space station | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that if we only look at how many research papers were written, the ISS looks like it did not do a good job for its high cost. The Hubble Telescope was much cheaper and did a lot more work. This is why a group named CASIS has the job of telling people about the positive side of the ISS so they will want to put money into it. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the writer mentions the Hubble Space Telescope to show that someone needs to tell people why the International Space Station (ISS) is actually good, because right now it looks like a bad deal compared to other space tools. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the writer uses the Hubble Space Telescope as an example of a project that was much cheaper than the ISS but produced many more research papers. Because the ISS has produced fewer papers and cost ten times as much, it looks like 'poor value' or a waste of money. To fix this bad image, an organization (CASIS) was hired to 'convince' people that the ISS is still worth the money. Mentioning the Hubble telescope highlights this gap in performance, which proves why the ISS needs better promotion to show its worth. |
| Q30 | D | From this, it has opted to focus on life science and medical research, and recently called for proposals for experiments on muscle wasting, osteoporosis and the immune system | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that CASIS chose to concentrate on medicine and biological science. Because of this, they recently asked for new experiment ideas (proposals) about specific medical problems like weak muscles and bones. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the organization called CASIS asked scientists to send in their plans and ideas for new studies related to human health. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because the text explains that CASIS decided to prioritize 'life science and medical research.' To find new projects, they 'called for proposals,' which is another way of saying they invited or asked researchers to submit their ideas for studies. The specific examples mentioned—muscle wasting, osteoporosis, and the immune system—are all health-based topics. |
| Q31 | C | Investment from outside organisations is vital, says Uhran, and a balance between academic and commercial research will help attract this | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Mark Uhran believes it is very important to get money from companies and that having both school-type research and business-type research will help keep the space station running. Answer Explanation: The answer is Mark Uhran, who believes the International Space Station should be used for business and making products to sell. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because Mark Uhran emphasizes the importance of 'commercial research.' In the text, he states that getting money or 'investment' from 'outside organisations' (businesses) is essential. He believes that the space station needs to provide a mix of study for school (academic) and research for business (commercial) to be successful. |
| Q32 | D | Some were aware of the ISS but they didn't know what's going on up there, she says. 'Others know there's science, but they don't know what kind.' | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that while some people have heard of the space station, they are not aware of the work being done there, and they do not know what specific types of science projects are being performed. Answer Explanation: The answer is Jeanne DiFrancesco, who believes that many people and organizations do not know what types of science experiments are happening on the International Space Station (ISS). Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because the passage describes Jeanne DiFrancesco’s research where she interviewed over 200 people. She found that many of them did not understand what was happening on the station or what specific 'kind' of science was being studied. This matches the idea of 'general ignorance' (not knowing) about the 'kinds of projects' (types of science) mentioned in the question. |
| Q33 | B | Besides suggesting that the agency reduces the time between approving experiments and sending them into space, it also recommended setting clearer research priorities | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that the report recommended that NASA cut down the waiting time for science tests, making the jump from approval to actual space flight happen faster. Answer Explanation: The answer is B because those who wrote the US National Academy of Sciences report believe that the time it takes for a project to go from being picked to being sent to the space station should be shorter. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the passage discusses a report from the US National Academy of Sciences. The authors of this report expressed concern about the long delays in NASA's research. Specifically, they suggested that the agency should work on 'reducing the time' between when experiments are 'approved' (accepted) and when they are 'sent into space' (put onto the ISS). This directly matches the idea of speeding up the process for accepted projects. |
| Q34 | C | Yet Mark Uhran, assistant associate administrator for the ISS, refutes the criticism that the station hasn't done any useful research | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Mark Uhran argues against the claim that the space station has failed to produce helpful research results. Answer Explanation: The answer means that Mark Uhran believes the work done on the International Space Station is more valuable than what many people think. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Mark Uhran because he disagrees with the people who say the space station is not doing helpful science. By 'refuting' (disagreeing with) this 'criticism' (negative feedback), he is saying that the station's work is actually useful and important, even if others do not see it that way. He uses the salmonella vaccine as an example of a successful project that shows the station's value. |
| Q35 | A | 'The only way to test this is in weightlessness, and the only time we have to do that is on the space station,' says Laurence Young, a space medicine expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Laurence Young says testing this machine requires weightlessness (no gravity) and that this testing can only happen on the space station. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the person named Laurence Young believes we must have a place with no gravity to correctly test new equipment for space. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because Laurence Young says that the 'only way' to test the centrifuge machine is in 'weightlessness.' In the text, 'weightlessness' is a synonym for the absence of gravity. He argues that because the machine aims to fix health problems caused by a lack of gravity, it must be evaluated in that exact environment to see if it actually works. Keywords to notice are 'weightlessness' (no gravity) and 'test' (assess). |
| Q36 | H | Companies like SpaceX could help NASA and its partners when it comes to resupplying the ISS, as it suggests it can reduce launch costs by two-thirds | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that private companies can help send supplies to the space station for much less money than before. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'economical,' which means something does not cost a lot of money or is cheap to do. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is H because the passage mentions that private companies like SpaceX can help NASA send supplies (food and equipment) to the space station. The text says these companies can "reduce launch costs by two-thirds," which means the price would be much lower than it is now. The word 'economical' describes something that saves money or is less expensive. |
| Q37 | D | Stern believes they will revolutionise the way we, the public, see space. Soon everyone will be dreaming of interplanetary travel again, he predicts | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Alan Stern thinks private companies will change the way regular people look at space, making them imagine and dream about traveling to other planets again. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'real', which means that space travel will feel like something that might actually happen rather than just a far-off fantasy. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'real' because the text explains that private companies will 'revolutionise' (change completely) the way 'the public' views space. By making space more accessible, these companies will get everyone 'dreaming' of travel between planets again. This change in how people think makes the idea of space exploration feel more like a 'real' possibility for ordinary people. |
| Q38 | F | This demand for low-cost space flight could eventually lead to a service running on a more frequent basis | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that because many people want cheap space travel, it might lead to a flight service that operates many times or more often. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'F', which stands for 'regular'. This means something that happens often or at fixed times. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'F' because the text discusses how the need for cheap space travel could result in flights happening on a 'more frequent basis'. In this context, 'frequent' is a synonym for 'regular', meaning the flights would happen more often and consistently as the demand grows. |
| Q39 | G | Getting flight experience should help them win a slot on the station, says Stern | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that because scientists have experience flying in space, they have a better chance to be chosen for a job on the station. Answer Explanation: The answer means that scientists will be the right choice for a job on the Space Station if they have already worked in space before. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is G (suitable) because the text explains that getting 'flight experience' on other flights makes it easier for scientists to 'win a slot,' which means to get a specific position or job on the station. When someone has the right experience and skills for a position, they are considered 'suitable' for it. |
| Q40 | B | How will NASA transform the International Space Station from a building site into a cutting-edge research laboratory | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage starts by asking how the station can be changed from just a construction project into a high-quality science lab, which sets the theme for explaining how to make the station more effective. Answer Explanation: The answer means the writer's goal is to show the different ways the International Space Station (ISS) can improve its work and become a better place for scientific research. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the article focuses on the future of the ISS and how it can be made more useful after spending a lot of money with little to show for it yet. It gives examples of how the station can improve, such as using new machines like centrifuges to study health, changing management to reduce paperwork (bureaucracy), and working with private companies to lower costs. These points illustrate a plan to make the station more productive and efficient. |
