The Future Never Dies? - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Past Papers Academic Reading Test 01 · Part 2 · Questions 14–26
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14 -26 which are based on Reading Passage 2 below.
The future never dies?
The prospects for humanity and for the world as a whole are somewhere between glorious and dire. It is hard to be much more precise.
A By ‘glorious’ I mean that our descendants - all who are born on to this Earth - could live very comfortably and securely, and could continue to do so for as long as the Earth can support life, which should be for a very long time indeed. We should at least be thinking in terms of the next million years. Furthermore, our descendants could continue to enjoy the company of other species - establishing a much better relationship with them than we have now. Other animals need not live in constant fear of us. Many of those fellow species now seem bound to become extinct, but a significant proportion could and should continue to live alongside US. Such a future may seem ideal, and so it is. Yet I do not believe it is fanciful. There is nothing in the physical fabric of the Earth or in our own biology to suggest that this is not possible.
B ‘Dire’ means that we human beings could be in deep trouble within the next few centuries, living but also dying in large numbers in political terror and from starvation, while huge numbers of our fellow creatures would simply disappear, leaving only the ones that we find convenient - chickens, cattle - or that we can't shake off, like flies and mice. I'm taking it to be self-evident that glory is preferable.
C Our future is not entirely in our own hands because the Earth has its own rules, is part of the solar system and is neither stable nor innately safe. Other planets in the solar system are quite beyond habitation, because their temperature is far too high or too low to be endured, and ours, too, in principle could tip either way. Even relatively unspectacular changes in the atmosphere could do the trick. The core of the Earth is hot, which in many ways is good for living creatures, but every now and again, the molten rock bursts through volcanoes on the surface. Among the biggest volcanic eruptions in recent memory was Mount St Helens, in the USA, which threw out a cubic kilometre of ash - fortunately in an area where very few people live. In 1815, Tambora (in present-day Indonesia) expelled so much ash into the upper atmosphere that climatic effects seriously harmed food production around the world for season after season. Entire civilisations have been destroyed by volcanoes.
D Yet nothing we have so far experienced shows what volcanoes can really do. Yellowstone National Park in the USA occupies the caldera (the crater formed when a volcano collapses) of an exceedingly ancient volcano of extraordinary magnitude. Modem surveys show that its centre is now rising. Sometime in the next 200 million years, Yellowstone could erupt again, and when it does, the whole world will be transformed. Yellowstone could erupt tomorrow. But there's a very good chance that it will give US another million years, and that surely is enough to be going on with. It seems sensible to assume that this will be the case.
E The universe at large is dangerous, too: in particular, we share the sky with vast numbers of asteroids, and every now and again, they come into our planet's atmosphere. An asteroid the size of a small island, hitting the Earth at 15,000 kilometres an hour (a relatively modest speed by the standards of heavenly bodies), would strike the ocean bed like a rock in a puddle, send a tidal wave around the world as high as a small mountain and as fast as a jumbo jet, and propel us into an ice age that could last for centuries. There are plans to head off such disasters (including rockets to push approaching asteroids into new trajectories), but in truth it's down to luck.
F On the other hand, the archaeological and the fossil evidence shows that no truly devastating asteroid has struck since the one that seems to have accounted for the extinction of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. So again, there seems no immediate reason for despair. The Earth is indeed an uncertain place, in an uncertain universe, but with average luck, it should do us well enough. If the world does become inhospitable in the next few thousand or million years, then it will probably be our own fault. In short, despite the underlying uncertainty, our own future and that of our fellow creatures is very much in our own hands.
G Given average luck on the geological and the cosmic scale, the difference between glory and disaster will be made, and is being made, by politics. Certain kinds of political systems and strategies would predispose US to long-term survival (and indeed to comfort and security and the pleasure of being alive), while others would take us more and more frenetically towards collapse. The broad point is, though, that we need to look at ourselves - humanity - and at the world in general in a quite new light. Our material problems are fundamentally those of biology. We need to think, and we need our politicians to think, biologically. Do that, and take the ideas seriously, and we are in with a chance. Ignore biology and we and our fellow creatures haven't a hope.
Questions
Questions 14–19 Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements reflect the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 2?
YES if the statement is true
NO if the statement is false
NOT GIVEN if the formation is not given to the passage
Questions 20–25 Summary Completion
Complete the summary below.
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
The Earth could become uninhabitable, like other planets, through a major change in the 20. Volcanic eruptions of 21 can lead to shortages of 22 in a wide area.
An asteroid hitting the Earth could create a 23 that would result in a new 24. Plans are being made to use 25 to deflect asteroids heading for the Earth.
Questions 26–26 One Choice
Choose the correct letter. A, B, C or D.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q14 | YES | Many of those fellow species now seem bound to become extinct, but a significant proportion could and should continue to live alongside US | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that many other types of animals and plants appear certain to die out completely and disappear forever. Answer Explanation: The answer YES means that the statement correctly matches the author's opinion that we can expect certain species to die out. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the author states in Paragraph A that many other living species seem "bound to become extinct." The phrase "bound to become extinct" means it is certain or predictable that they will die out and disappear, which directly supports the statement. |
| Q15 | NO | There is nothing in the physical fabric of the Earth or in our own biology to suggest that this is not possible | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that nothing about the Earth's physical structure or human bodies prevents us from continuing to live here in the future. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the statement is false according to the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the author explicitly states that there is no physical or biological reason that prevents humans from surviving for a million years. The statement says it is 'impossible' to survive, which directly contradicts the text. Keywords like 'biology' and 'physical fabric of the Earth' show that surviving for a very long time is actually possible. |
| Q16 | YES | Yet nothing we have so far experienced shows what volcanoes can really do. Yellowstone National Park in the USA occupies the caldera (the crater formed when a volcano collapses) of an exceedingly ancient volcano of extraordinary magnitude | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that human beings have not yet seen how powerful a volcano explosion can truly be. It points out that Yellowstone is built on a very ancient and extremely large volcano. Answer Explanation: The answer agrees with the statement that a future volcano explosion at Yellowstone will probably cause more damage than any past volcano explosions. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the author states that past volcanic events do not compare to what volcanoes are truly capable of doing. The author describes Yellowstone as a huge ancient volcano and explains that if it erupts again, it will change the entire world, showing it will be more destructive than past eruptions. |
| Q17 | NOT GIVEN | The universe at large is dangerous, too: in particular, we share the sky with vast numbers of asteroids, and every now and again, they come into our planet's atmosphere | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that there are many asteroids in space and sometimes they enter Earth's atmosphere, but it does not compare how often small asteroids hit Earth compared to big ones. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the text does not tell us if small asteroids are more likely to hit the Earth than large ones. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the writer mentions that asteroids come into Earth's atmosphere and discusses the impact of an asteroid the size of a small island, the text does not compare the chance or probability of Earth being hit by small asteroids versus large ones. Because this information is missing, the statement cannot be verified. |
| Q18 | NO | If the world does become inhospitable in the next few thousand or million years, then it will probably be our own fault | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that if the Earth becomes a place where people and animals cannot live, it will most likely be caused by humans themselves, not by natural disasters. Answer Explanation: The answer "NO" means that the statement is false according to the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the statement says that natural disasters are the main reason the world might become impossible to live in, but the author says the opposite. In Paragraph F, the author explains that if the Earth becomes "inhospitable" (uninhabitable or unsafe to live in), it will "probably be our own fault" (caused by human actions rather than natural events). Therefore, the statement directly contradicts the passage. |
| Q19 | NOT GIVEN | We need to think, and we need our politicians to think, biologically | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows that the author wants leaders and politicians to think in a biological way, but it does not give any information about whether current politicians will actually change their thinking. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the text does not state whether politicians who are currently in power are likely or unlikely to change the way they think. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage only mentions that we need politicians to start thinking biologically, but it never talks about politicians currently in power or whether they are willing or unlikely to change their mindset. Because there is no information about current politicians' likelihood to change, the statement cannot be proven true or false. |
| Q20 | Temperature | Other planets in the solar system are quite beyond habitation, because their temperature is far too high or too low to be endured, and ours, too, in principle could tip either way | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that people cannot live on other planets because they are either too hot or too cold, and Earth's temperature could also change and become impossible to live in. Answer Explanation: The answer means how hot or cold a place is. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "temperature" because the text explains that other planets cannot be lived on because their temperature is too hot or too cold, and Earth's condition could also change in a similar way. |
| Q21 | molten rock / rock / molten ash / ash | every now and again, the molten rock bursts through volcanoes on the surface. Among the biggest volcanic eruptions in recent memory was Mount St Helens, in the USA, which threw out a cubic kilometre of ash | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that melted rock shoots out from volcanoes, and large volcanic explosions throw out massive amounts of ash. Answer Explanation: The answer means liquid rock or powder-like dust that comes out of a volcano when it explodes. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "(molten) rock/ash" because the text describes how volcanoes burst out melted rock ("molten rock") and throw huge amounts of grey dust ("ash") into the air during eruptions. |
| Q22 | food / food production | In 1815, Tambora (in present-day Indonesia) expelled so much ash into the upper atmosphere that climatic effects seriously harmed food production around the world for season after season | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when the Tambora volcano threw a lot of ash into the sky, it changed the climate and badly damaged the ability to grow food across the globe for several years. Answer Explanation: The answer means the items that people and animals eat to live and grow. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'Food' because the passage mentions in Paragraph C that a huge volcano in 1815 sent ash high into the air, which caused climate changes that 'seriously harmed food production around the world'. This shows that volcanic ash can cause shortages of food across a large area. |
| Q23 | Tidal wave | An asteroid the size of a small island, hitting the Earth at 15,000 kilometres an hour (a relatively modest speed by the standards of heavenly bodies), would strike the ocean bed like a rock in a puddle, send a tidal wave around the world as high as a small mountain and as fast as a jumbo jet, and propel us into an ice age that could last for centuries | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that if a large asteroid hits the Earth's ocean, it will create a giant wave called a tidal wave that spreads around the planet and causes a long ice age. Answer Explanation: The answer means a very huge wave in the sea caused by a major event, such as a large object hitting the ocean. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'Tidal wave' because Section E explains that if an asteroid hits the ocean on Earth, it will create and send a giant 'tidal wave' around the world. This directly fills in the summary blank about what an asteroid hitting the Earth would create. |
| Q24 | Ice age | An asteroid the size of a small island, hitting the Earth at 15,000 kilometres an hour (a relatively modest speed by the standards of heavenly bodies), would strike the ocean bed like a rock in a puddle, send a tidal wave around the world as high as a small mountain and as fast as a jumbo jet, and propel us into an ice age that could last for centuries | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that if a large space rock hits the ocean, it will cause a giant wave and push our planet into a very cold period (an ice age) that lasts for a long time. Answer Explanation: The answer means a long period of extremely cold weather where ice covers large parts of the Earth. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'Ice age' (or 'ice age') because Paragraph E describes the dangerous effects of a large asteroid hitting the Earth's ocean. The text explains that such an impact would send out a massive wave and 'propel us into an ice age' that could go on for hundreds of years. Therefore, 'ice age' fits the summary sentence about the result of an asteroid collision. |
| Q25 | Rockets | There are plans to head off such disasters (including rockets to push approaching asteroids into new trajectories), but in truth it's down to luck | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that people have plans to prevent space disasters, which include using rockets to change the direction of asteroids that are moving toward Earth. Answer Explanation: The answer means spacecraft powered by engines that can travel into space. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'Rockets' because the text in Paragraph E explains that there are plans to avoid asteroid disasters, which involve using rockets to push coming asteroids into new paths (trajectories). |
| Q26 | D | The broad point is, though, that we need to look at ourselves - humanity - and at the world in general in a quite new light. Our material problems are fundamentally those of biology. We need to think, and we need our politicians to think, biologically | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the main idea is that humans must view themselves and the world differently, and that both regular people and leaders need to change their way of thinking. Answer Explanation: The answer choice D means that the writer's goal is to convince people and politicians to change how they think and act in order to protect the future. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because the writer explicitly states the main point in the final paragraph. The author explains that humans must view themselves and the world in a completely new way, specifically stating that we and our politicians need to 'think biologically' to survive. This shows the author's main purpose is to convince readers of the need for a fundamental shift in human behavior and thinking. |
