The Luddites - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Barrons IELTS Practice Exams Academic Reading Test 1 · Part 3 · Questions 27–40
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27–40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
The Luddites
The term Luddite is used to refer to a person who is opposed to new technology. The word derives from the name Ned Ludd, a man who may or may not have actually existed. The original Luddites were textile workers in early nineteenth-century England who protested changes brought on by the industrial revolution. These weavers made lace and stockings by hand, carrying out their craft independently in their homes according to traditional methods. In the 1800s, automated power looms and stocking frames were introduced, radically changing the traditional work system. Weavers’ work was moved from individual homes to factories; individuals could not afford to buy the new machines for themselves. The new machines were not difficult to run. They could be operated by unskilled workers and turned out an inferior product, but they produced large quantities cheaply, which was the aim of the new factory owners. The makers of finely crafted, handmade textiles could not compete with the new machines. Instead of continuing their tradition as skilled, independent workers, they would have to go to work in factories for low wages.
The industrial revolution was happening everywhere. In the textile-producing towns of England, workers focused on the new weaving machines as the source of their troubles. The height of Luddite activity occurred in the years 1811–1812. Groups of men, often in disguise, would arrive at a factory and make demands for higher wages and better working conditions. If these demands were not met, the group retaliated by smashing the factory machines. These groups often claimed that they were working under the command of General Ned Ludd, and thus came to be called Luddites.
Who was Ned Ludd? Rumors about this mysterious person abounded. He came to be associated with that traditional champion of the poor, Robin Hood. The original Luddite activity was centered around Nottingham, and many said that Ned Ludd hid out in nearby Sherwood Forest, just as the legendary Robin Hood had. According to another tradition, Ned Ludd was a weaver who had accidentally broken two stocking frames, and from that, came to be the one blamed any time an expensive piece of weaving equipment was damaged. Whoever Ned Ludd may or may not have been, riots protesting the new factories were carried out in his name throughout England’s textile-producing region.
Workers’ families suffered as wages fell and food prices rose. There were food riots in several towns, and Luddite activity spread. In the winter of 1812, the Frame-Breaking Act was passed, making the destruction of factory equipment a crime punishable by death. The government sent thousands of troops into areas affected by the riots. In the spring of that year, several factory owners were killed during Luddite riots, and a number of textile workers died as well. Following one of the largest incidents, when rioters set fire to a mill in Westhoughton, four rioters, including a young boy, were executed. In another incident that spring, a group of over a thousand workers attacked a mill in Lancashire with sticks and rocks. When they were beaten back by armed guards protecting the mill, they moved to the mill owner’s house and burned it down. The wave of violence resulted in a crack down by the government. Suspected Luddites were arrested and imprisoned, and many of them were hanged.
By the summer of 1812, Luddite activity had begun to die down, although there continued to be sporadic incidents over the next several years. In 1816, a bad harvest and economic downturn led to a small revival of rioting. In June of that year, workers attacked two mills, smashing equipment and causing thousands of dollars worth of damage. Government troops were brought in to stop the violence. In the end, six of the rioters were executed for their participation. However, rioting never again reached the levels it had in 1811 and 1812.
The Luddites were short-lived, but they left an impressive mark. They were responsible for destroying close to one thousand weaving machines during the height of their activity in 1811–1812, as well as burning down several factories. Beyond the physical damage, however, they left their mark in people’s minds. The famed English novelist Charlotte Brontë set her novel Shirley in Yorkshire at the time of the riots. This novel is still widely read today. In our present time of rapid technological change, people who are concerned about the pace of technological advance often call themselves Neo-Luddites. Although the responses to it may differ, concern about the changes brought on by technology continues.
Questions
Questions 27–32 Matching Features
Match each cause in List A with its effect in List B. There are more effects in List B than you will need, so you will not use them all.
A. Troops were sent into the area.
B. Weavers stopped working at home and went to work in factories.
C. Rioters often wore disguises.
D. Workers destroyed factory equipment.
E. Many rioters were hanged.
F. Charlotte Brontë wrote a novel about the Luddites.
G. Prices went up, and salaries went down.
H. Factory owners did not need to hire skilled weavers.
I. Luddite rioting resumed for a short while.
J. People compared Ned Ludd to Robin Hood.
Questions 33–40 True / False / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage?
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q27 | B | Weavers’ work was moved from individual homes to factories; individuals could not afford to buy the new machines for themselves | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that regular people did not have enough money to buy the new machines, which caused weavers to leave their home workshops and go to work in factories. Answer Explanation: The answer choice B means that cloth makers stopped working inside their own homes and started working in big factory buildings. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the passage directly connects the high cost of the new machinery (the cause) to workers moving into factories (the effect). Since individual weavers could not pay for the expensive new machines themselves, they could no longer work independently at home and had to go work in factories instead. |
| Q28 | H | The new machines were not difficult to run. They could be operated by unskilled workers | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that the new equipment was easy to use, so people without special skills could work with it. Answer Explanation: The answer means that people who owned factories did not need to hire workers with special skills or training. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is H because the text explains that the new weaving machinery was simple to use, which meant factory owners could use workers who did not have special skills. In the passage, the phrase "not difficult to run" means the same as "easy to operate," and using "unskilled workers" explains why factory owners did not need skilled weavers. |
| Q29 | D | Groups of men, often in disguise, would arrive at a factory and make demands for higher wages and better working conditions. If these demands were not met, the group retaliated by smashing the factory machines | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that groups of men went to factories to ask for more money and better working environments. If their requests were not accepted, they destroyed the machines inside the factory. Answer Explanation: The answer "D" means that workers broke or destroyed the equipment in factories. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because the text explains that when factory owners refused to give workers better pay ("higher wages") and better conditions, the workers fought back ("retaliated") by breaking ("smashing") the factory machines. |
| Q30 | A | There were food riots in several towns, and Luddite activity spread. In the winter of 1812, the Frame-Breaking Act was passed, making the destruction of factory equipment a crime punishable by death. The government sent thousands of troops into areas affected by the riots | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows that when riots broke out in different towns, the government sent thousands of soldiers into the places where the riots were happening. Answer Explanation: The answer means that soldiers were sent to the places where the rioting took place. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because the text states that as food riots and Luddite actions spread to many towns, the government reacted by sending thousands of troops (soldiers) into those affected areas. The keyword 'riots' in the question connects directly to the result that 'troops were sent' into those regions. |
| Q31 | E | In the winter of 1812, the Frame-Breaking Act was passed, making the destruction of factory equipment a crime punishable by death Suspected Luddites were arrested and imprisoned, and many of them were hanged |
Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that in 1812, a law was created to make breaking factory machines a crime for which a person could be killed as punishment. Later, many people believed to be Luddite rioters were caught by the police and killed by hanging. Answer Explanation: The answer means that as a result of the new law, many people who took part in the riots were executed by hanging. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is E because the passage states that the government created the Frame-Breaking Act, a law making the breaking of factory machinery a crime that carried the death penalty ('punishable by death'). As a result of this government action against the rioters, many suspected Luddites were caught and hanged. |
| Q32 | I | In 1816, a bad harvest and economic downturn led to a small revival of rioting | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that in 1816, a poor crop harvest and a worsening economy caused a short restart of rioting. Answer Explanation: The answer "I" means that rioting by the Luddites started again for a brief period of time. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is I because the passage states that in 1816, bad economic conditions ("economic downturn") caused rioting to happen again for a brief period ("a small revival of rioting"). Therefore, worsening economic conditions in 1816 (the cause) led to a brief restart of Luddite rioting (the effect). |
| Q33 | TRUE | The term Luddite is used to refer to a person who is opposed to new technology | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the word Luddite is used for a person who fights or works against new machines and tech tools. Answer Explanation: The answer TRUE means that the statement agrees with the information in the reading passage. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the very first sentence of the passage directly defines a Luddite as someone who is opposed to new technology. In this context, 'opposed to' means the same thing as 'resists'. |
| Q34 | TRUE | The original Luddites were textile workers in early nineteenth-century England who protested changes brought on by the industrial revolution. These weavers made lace and stockings by hand, carrying out their craft independently in their homes according to traditional methods | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that in early nineteenth-century England, before new machines changed how work was done, weavers made lace and stockings by hand following traditional methods. Answer Explanation: The answer TRUE means that the statement correctly matches the information provided in the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the text explains that before machine automation was introduced in the 1800s (the nineteenth century), textile workers used traditional methods to make lace and stockings by hand in their own homes. |
| Q35 | TRUE | In the spring of that year, several factory owners were killed during Luddite riots, and a number of textile workers died as well | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that during the violent fights in spring, some people who owned factories were killed, and some factory workers died too. Answer Explanation: The answer TRUE means that the statement correctly matches the information given in the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage clearly states that both factory owners and textile workers lost their lives during the Luddite riots in the spring of 1812. Keywords like 'factory owners were killed' and 'textile workers died' directly support this statement. |
| Q36 | NOT GIVEN | The original Luddites were textile workers in early nineteenth-century England who protested changes brought on by the industrial revolution | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage tells us that the first Luddites were cloth workers in England in the early 1800s, but it gives no details about whether their actions reached other countries. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the provided text does not say whether or not the Luddite movement went to other countries outside of England. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage only mentions that the Luddites were active in England. It does not provide any information about whether the movement stayed in England or spread to other parts of the world. |
| Q37 | TRUE | The word derives from the name Ned Ludd, a man who may or may not have actually existed | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the name Ned Ludd comes from a person who might have been real or might not have been real, showing that his exact identity is not known for certain. Answer Explanation: The answer TRUE means that the given statement agrees with the information in the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the text clearly states that Ned Ludd was a mysterious figure and people are not sure if he was even a real person. Since there were only rumors and different stories about him, nobody knows his true identity for sure. |
| Q38 | FALSE | In June of that year, workers attacked two mills, smashing equipment and causing thousands of dollars worth of damage | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows that in June 1816, workers violently attacked two factories, destroyed machines, and caused a lot of damage. Answer Explanation: The answer FALSE means that the statement is wrong according to the passage. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the worker protests in 1816 were violent, not nonviolent. During that time, workers attacked factories, broke machines, and caused heavy damage, which required soldiers to stop the violence. |
| Q39 | FALSE | The Luddites were short-lived, but they left an impressive mark | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the Luddites existed for only a short time ("short-lived"), so it is incorrect to say their activity lasted for many years. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the text states that the Luddites existed for only a brief period, rather than lasting for a long time. The passage specifically describes them as "short-lived", which means their main actions lasted only a short time. |
| Q40 | NOT GIVEN | In our present time of rapid technological change, people who are concerned about the pace of technological advance often call themselves Neo-Luddites | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that people today who worry about fast technology changes call themselves Neo-Luddites, but it says nothing about their use of computers. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the text does not state whether Neo-Luddites use computers or not. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the passage introduces Neo-Luddites as people who worry about the fast speed of technology, it never mentions whether or not these modern individuals use computers. Since this specific detail is missing from the text, the statement cannot be marked as true or false. |
