🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 4+: The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

Image for topic: The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image depicts a bar chart comparing waste disposal methods in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. The chart's vertical axis represents the percentage of total waste, while the horizontal axis lists the cities. Each city has four colored bars, corresponding to landfill (orange), incineration (blue), recycling (red), and composting (green), showing their respective percentages. Toronto: landfill 20%, incineration 30%, recycling 20%, composting 70%. Madrid: landfill 40%, incineration 10%, recycling 30%, composting 50%. Kuala Lumpur: landfill 70%, incineration 5%, recycling 20%, composting 10%. Amman: landfill 60%, incineration 0%, recycling 40%, composting 10%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart gives information on waste manegment techniques in different cities, namely Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.

Overall, it can be seen from this graph is that The percentage of using recycling and compositing methods of every city is the least rate, while using incineration method is common in all areas, apart from Toronto. Incineration rate ranked second position after landfill technique in Amman and Toronto.

Firstly, if we look at the percentage points of using garbage disposal methods in Toronto, landliff stands at approximately 75 %, which is not only higher than the others, but it is also substantially more significant. The figure of incineration accounts for just above 10 %, while other methods, including recycling and compositing rate represents less than 10 %, with former at 7 % and latter at 6 %. Regarding ways of getting rid of waste in Madrid, the most common option is incineration, which accounts for 40 %, almost twice as much as the utilizing of recycling, at 22 % and starts third position. The landliff method is the most next common with 30 %, while the rate of compositing is at just below 9 %.

Secondly, those figures in Kuala Lumpur, incineration is this one whose percentage makes up a considerable higher with 55 % in all other categories, its percent is third times as high as landliff, at 18 %. Recycling is at 23 %, whereas compositing accounts for merely 6 %. With respect to trash handling systems in Amman, the most amount of trash is wasted with landliff technique with just around half of total waste disposal, which is 12 % higher than that of incineration, making up 47 %. The extent of using recycling and composting comprise the least rates, 11% and 3 % respectively.

Word Count: 298

Answers On The Same Topic:

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The bar graph illustrates data about various methods of waste disposal in four cities-Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. The units are measured in percentages. Overall, it can be clearly seen that the highest amount of waste was disposed by landfill in Toronto, whereas people from Amman disposed the lowest amount of rubbish by composting. […]

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of total waste disposed of using four methods – landfill,incineration,recycling,and composting – in four cities. In Toranto,only landfill method implemeted higly,among other methods.The methods were employed in almost equal proportions in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur. Copmosting is the least commonly used method of waste disposal in cities. The percentage […]

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The bar chart illustrates the percentages of total trash removal utilize in four different methods in four cities (Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman). Overall, in Toronto, the percentage of landfill increases significantly, while in Kuala Lumpur the incineration show the highest level compared with other cities. However, the recycling method in Madrid and Kuala […]

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The bar chart shows how four cities (Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman) deal with their trash. There are four methods: landfill, incineration, recycling, and composting. In general, most cities use landfill and incineration the most. Recycling and composting are not very popular in any of these cities. First, landfill is the most popular method […]

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The given chart illustrates percentage of waste disposal methods used by four cities such as Landfil, Incineration, Recycling and Compositin. Toronto has done mover then 70% of its waste disposal through landinfill method on the other hand, very small amount of other methods have been used with little variations nearly under 10% Incomparision, Amman use […]

See All

Other Topics:

WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

“The bar chart compares the proportions of men and women in six different age groups who participated in regular physical activity in Australia in 2010. Overall, women were generally more active than men in most age groups. The only exceptions were the youngest group, where men were slightly more active, and the oldest group, where […]

The bar chart illustrates the expenditure on Health and Education in UAE from 1985 to 1993. The line graph gives information about child mortality as well as life expectancy from 1970 to 1992 in the same country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given chart compares the expenses on health and Education, in terms of GDP in Dubai, over a span of 8 years, between 1985 and 1993. Overall, the largest proportion of the cost has recorded on education, followed by upward trend. whereas, health consisted the low expenditure with a steadly fluctuated proportion, throughout the year. […]

The graphs below show four categories of citrus fruits and the top three countries to which these were exported (in thousand kg) in 2012.

The table delineates four categories of citrus fruits along with the top three countries to which these were exported in 2012. Units are measured in thousand kg. A quick look at the table reveals that the oranges were the most exported fruit compared to other three citrus fruits, while other categories of citrus fruits were […]

The bar chart below compares the performance of two artificial intelligence models, GPT-4o-mini and GPT-o1, across three evaluation metrics (ROUGE-1, ROUGE-L and METEOR) in four long-text generation tasks. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The illustration gives information about comparison between GPT-40 and GPT-01 across different metrics. Overall, GPT-40 outperforms and achieve highest scores from GPT-01. The task 1 meteor was dominant candidate among all other dataset, where both GPT-40 and 01 are on the top in scores. In contrast, ROUGE-L gains scores hovering around 0.19 for both artificial […]

The bar chart below shows the different types of electronic devices used by people in Australia in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The illustration gives information about usage of different digital devices by Australian citizens in 2008. Overall, what is the most striking when looking at the chart is that smartphones were the ultimate choice of young people to use. However, E-reader was one of those electronic devices to be utilized by older people as they do […]

The bar chart below shows the different types of electronic devices used by people in Australia in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the use of digital devices among individuals in different stages of life in Australia in 2008. What is most striking when looking at the chart is that smartphones and tablets were considerably more popular among younger people, whereas e-readers were overwhelmingly preferred by the oldest group. It is also clear that […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.