The data is given as a bar chart demonstrating a comparison among four different cities and their approaches of waste removal. Regarding the structure of the chart, while the vertical axis shows the total percentage of waste, horizontal one represents the cities.
At first glance, frequencies of all four methods of getting rid of the waste considerably differ in each country. Albeit, unsustainable approaches are in prevalence in every country rather than the healthy ones. Given that unhealthy are landfill and incineration, meanwhile, sustainable are recycling and compositing.
Comparing the first two cities, which are Toronto and Madrid, a significant difference in choosing the method can be observed. Although the main way of resolving rubbish problem in Toronto Is landfill, Madrid prefers the incineration. Moreover, it can be inferred that recycling and compositing are not demanded in both countries for their low digits, specifically less than 30%.
In terms of differences and similarities between Kuala Lumpur and Amman, each city is not prone to select compositing owing to its less than 10% index. Taking into a consideration the incineration, it is not craved by Amman but Kuala Lumpur removing roughly 55% of trash by means of this way. Though in Amman almost 50% is eliminated via landfill, which is not applicable to Kuala Lumpur with only 15%.