24 Hours Only: Get 39% OFF on Our Premium Plan - Check Out Now!
Bar Chart

Band 5+: The chart below shows the percentages ofdifferent types of householdwaste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featuresand make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Image for topic: The chart below shows the percentages ofdifferent types of householdwaste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featuresand make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image illustrates the percentages of household waste types recycled in one city in 1992, 1997, and 2002. Plastic: approximately 10% in 1992, around 10% in 1997, just over 10% in 2002. Cans: about 12% in 1992, nearly 23% in 1997, close to 27% in 2002. Paper: roughly 15% in 1992, around 25% in 1997, nearly 37% in 2002. Glass: approximately 50% in 1992, close to 40% in 1997, slightly above 50% in 2002.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The graph illustrates the changes of different kinds of household waste that were recycled in one city from 1992 to 2002.

It is noticeable that canes, paper, and glass were the highest percentage of household waste recycled in 2002, while plastic was the same rate between 1997 and 2002 .All materials without canes were the smallest proportion in the first year; however, recycled canes was the largest number in 1997.

In detail, plastic was more than 10% in 1992, followed by a slow incline. In contrast, canes had decreased to 5% by 1997. After declining steadily, the number of recycled beans started to increase significantly until 2002. Paper and glass have been growing for all these years. In 1992, these materials had the same rate – approximately 15%. Plastic was as common as canes. In other words, they had nearly one-third of the total percentage of household waste in 1997. Glass was far more than plastic in the next years. The difference between them was around 10 percent.

Word Count: 168

Answers On The Same Topic:

The chart below shows the percentages ofdifferent types of householdwaste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featuresand make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The bar chart illustrates the percentages of four types of household waste that were recycled in a city between 1992 and 2002. Overall, it is clear that the proportion of all waste materials recycled increased over the period. Glass and paper showed the highest recycling rates by the end of the timeframe, while plastic remained […]

The chart below shows the percentages ofdifferent types of householdwaste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featuresand make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The chart illustrates the recycling rates of various types of household waste in a city over a decade, specifically from 1992 to 2002. Overall, the data reveals a significant increase in the recycling percentages of paper, cans, and glass, while the recycling rate for plastic remained relatively stagnant throughout the observed period. In 1992, the […]

The chart below shows the percentages ofdifferent types of householdwaste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featuresand make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The bar chart illustrates the percentages of various types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. The bar chart provides information about the recycling rates of household waste, such as glass, paper, cans, and plastic, (given in percentages) in a particular city over the period from 1992 to 2002. […]

The chart below shows the percentages ofdifferent types of householdwaste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featuresand make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The chart compares the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city during the years 1992 to 2002. Overall, most categories showed a noticeable increase over the period, while only plastic remained stable. There was a considerable rise in the recycling of glass and paper, whereas the figure for plastic […]

The chart below shows the percentages ofdifferent types of householdwaste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featuresand make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

An illustration depicts the proportion of various categories of domestic rubbish that were recovered in a city over a decade, from 1992 to 2002. Overall, we can see that almost all the rates of recycled products underwent a noticeable rise, except for cans. While the reproducing percentage of three materials (Plastic, Paper, and Glass) showed […]

See All

Other Topics:

The bar graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members in different faculties of a particular university in 2008.

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of male and female academic staff members in distinct faculties, namely arts, astronomy, history, engineering, law, medicine, and science, of a specific university in the year 2008. Overall, it can be seen that in arts, history, and medicine departments, the percentage of females was higher than that of males. […]

The chart below give information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010

The bar chart shows the percentages of people in five age groups that participated in an activity during 1990 and 2010. Overall, we can see a clear change in the trends. Participation of young people went down, but for the older people it increased. In 1990, the group of 36-50 was the most active, but […]

The chart below give information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010

The bar chart compares how many people from five age groups participated in an activity in 1990 and 2010. Overall, the graph shows that participation went down for younger people but went up for older people over the twenty years. In 1990, the 36-50 age group was the most active, but in 2010, the 51-65 […]

The chart below give information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010

The bar chart shows the percentages of people in five different age groups who took part in a particular activity in 1990 and 2010. Overall, it is clear that participation decreased among younger people over the twenty-year period, while it increased for the older age groups. The middle-aged group (36-50) was the most active in […]

The chart below give information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010

The group bar chart compares the proportion of people in five different age brackets who participate in a specific activity in the years 1990 and 2010. Overall, the data show a significant fluctuation in the participation trends over the twenty year period. While engagement levels generally declined among younger age groups (18 – 50), there […]

The bar chart gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to the charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2000.

the graph illustrates the proportions of british people contributing tocharity by age groups for the years 1990 and 2010. overall, there was an increased with those aged under, and declining for those over 50. In 1990, the 36-50 age group was the most charitable group reaching 40% contributions, followed by 51-65 age group at about […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible and free for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
1000+ IELTS Tests & Samples
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & Content
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
279,000₫ 157,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 5,233₫/ngày)
819,000₫ 397,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 4,411₫/ngày)
1,649,000₫ 667,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 3,706₫/ngày)
3,299,000₫ 857,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 2,381₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.