The data presents the percentage of Australian residents who spent time visiting cultural heritage sites in 2010. Overall, it is evident that the theatre became the least visited facility that year. In contrast, cinema became visitors’ top of mind in the same year.
Cinema was the citizens’ favorite, particularly among native citizens, which accounts for more than two-thirds (70%) of the population. Likewise, both migrant groups also favor cinema for leisures where 50% or more had the same views on cinema.
A close contender to the cinema was libraries. Remarkably, libraries were the favorite among them, opting for approximately 55% of residents. In contrast, native-born Australians showed less interest in this facility, with only around 35% reporting visits. New migrants from English-speaking countries fell in between, with just over 45% frequenting libraries.
Subsequently, a fraction of residents spent their free time visiting animal farms and theatres. Among all, nationwide migrants dominate visitors proportion of animal farms where their english-speaker counterparts rarely find it engaging where only a fraction of 33% population found it enjoyable. Likewise, theatre became the least respected options among all four, where a small proportion of migrants spent their leisure time here and only around 25% of indigenous citizens opt for this option.