Pie Chart

Band 5+: the chart illustrates that cource contributions to annual average pm concentrations in tashkent

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: the chart illustrates that cource contributions to annual average pm concentrations in tashkent

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image shows a donut chart titled 'Figure ES.1: Source contributions to annual average PM2.5 concentrations in Tashkent', detailing the following percentage breakdowns for PM2.5 sources: Boundary / Windblown Dust, 36%; Residential / Commercial Heating, 29% (the chart slice is labeled 28%); Transport, 16%; Light Industry, 7%; Heavy Industry, 6%; Urban Dust, 6%; and Waste Burning, 1%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The pie chart illustrates data regarding source inputs to annual moderate level of PM2.5 in capital of Uzbekistan.

Overall, what can be seen from the chart that in Tashkent, the value of boundary Windblown Dust concentrations was higher, while percentage of urban dust and heavy industries was lesser than others over the given period.

The rate of Boundry Windblown Dust extract constituted just over a third and it was larger than others. At this point, the amount of residental heating made up to 29% and quantity of vehicles was smaller by 13% as well as it composed to more than a fifth.

More specifically, the grade of light industry index comprised to 7%, however the percentage of urban dust and heavy industry was a little smaller than them as well as is stood at 6%. Following this, the value of waste burning was only 1% and this was lower rate compared with others.

Word Count: 153

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

5.5

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
C1 - Intricate
Strive to incorporate even richer and more precise language.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

others: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report adequately addresses the task by summarizing the main features of the pie chart. The overview is present and highlights the most significant contributions to PM2.5 concentrations. The data is generally presented accurately, though there are some minor inaccuracies. To improve, ensure precise data reporting and vary sentence structure for better readability. Also, avoid using phrases like 'value of' or 'amount of' when simply referring to percentages.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report's organization is somewhat clear, but the flow of information could be improved. The introduction and overview are present, but the body paragraphs lack clear topic sentences and transitions. Consider using more cohesive devices to link ideas within and between paragraphs. For example, using transition words like 'similarly,' 'in contrast,' or 'furthermore' can enhance the logical progression of your writing. Additionally, ensure that each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the data to improve coherence.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive. There is an attempt to use synonyms, but the choices are not always accurate or appropriate ('extract' instead of 'contribution,' 'grade' instead of 'percentage'). To improve, try to use a wider range of vocabulary related to data description and source contributions. Focus on using more precise and varied language to describe the quantities and relationships presented in the chart. For example, instead of 'larger than others,' consider using 'constituted the largest proportion' or 'was significantly higher than other sources.'

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report contains several grammatical errors that affect clarity. Common errors include incorrect verb tense ('was higher' instead of 'was the highest'), incorrect preposition use ('in capital of Uzbekistan'), and awkward phrasing ('quantity of vehicles was smaller by 13% as well as it composed to more than a fifth'). To improve, focus on using a variety of sentence structures and ensuring grammatical accuracy. Pay attention to subject-verb agreement, correct tense usage, and appropriate preposition choice. Proofreading carefully for these errors can significantly enhance the clarity and accuracy of your writing.

Answers On The Same Topic:

the chart illustrates that cource contributions to annual average pm concentrations in tashkent

The pie chart illustrate the proportion of source contributions to the annual PM concentrations in tashkent. Overall, it is evident that boundary and windblown dust accounted for the greatest share of the total, whereas waste burning represented only a minimal proportion. The remaining categories occupied moderate percentages, with noticeable disparities between the dominant and less […]

Band 7+

the chart illustrates that cource contributions to annual average pm concentrations in tashkent

The pie chart illustrates the percentage of annual contribution to average PM from different sources in Tashkent. Overall, Boundary/ Windblown dust contributes the largest proportion whereas waste burning accounts for the smallest proportion to annual average PM concentration. Wundblown dust holds the first position in contribution to annual average PM, at 36%. Relatively, Residential accounts […]

Band 5+

the chart illustrates that cource contributions to annual average pm concentrations in tashkent

The pie chart illustrates the number of sources which contributes to the concentration of annual average PM2.5 in Tashkent. Overall, it is evident that boundary/windblown dust accounted for highest contribution to the PM2.5, while residential/ commercial heating and transport are followed that. In contrast, urban dust, waste burning, heavy industry, and light industry contributed minor […]

Band 6+

the chart illustrates that cource contributions to annual average pm concentrations in tashkent

The provided chart compares the percentages of source contributions to annual average PM 2.5 concentrations in Tashkent. Overall, boundary and windblown dust led the chart and with its the highest percentage, while waste burning remained as the least contributor. Furthermore, three of those sources – light industry, heavy industry and urban dust – showed almost […]

Band 6+

See All

The two pie charts show how different industries used electricity in 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two pie charts illustrate percentage of area in electricity in 1995 and 2005. There are have 5 main key figures : food, fishery, manufacturing, household, service. Overall, manufacturing is a leader in the both of years. it takes 33 percent in 1995 and the lowest of the charts is service , service is only […]

Band 4+

The pie chart shows the energy use in Australian homes in 2008

The pie chart illustrates the proportions of energy consumed for various purposes in Australian households in the year 2008. Overall, it is clear that heating and cooling, along with water heating, accounted for the vast majority of domestic energy usage. In contrast, cooking and stand-by power represented a negligible proportion of the total energy consumed. […]

Band 9

The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010.

The charts illustrate 100 visitors’ rated satisfaction level to the hotel’s customer service in the Parkway Hotel in 2005 and 2010. Overall, visitors’ votes shifted positively over a 5-year period. While very poor, poor and satisfactory voices fell dramatically, the excelent and good parts increased suddenly. Furthermore, satisfactory lost its position as the dominant good […]

Band 4+

The pie chart gives us the percentages of people being informed about health literacy and covid by different means in 2020

The pie chart demonstrates the amount of people being informed about health literacy and Covid-19 by different means in 2020. Overall, television was by far the most commonly used source of information, far surpassing all the other categories. Meanwhile, hospitals and primary care clinics were among the least commonly used sources of information. Although family […]

Band 5+

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium