Band 4+: The chart illustrates the distances travelled by passengers on 5 types of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000. The data is presented in kilometers per person per week. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The report attempts to address the task but contains several inaccuracies and omissions that affect the clarity of the response. Key data points are misreported: for example, the leading transport type is incorrectly identified as bus (rail is the highest in both years), and the overall trend is inaccurately described as having no substantial changes when most transport types increased. Some figures are also incorrect, such as the 1990 bicycle distance and the total distances. Additionally, the report does not clearly summarize the main features or make consistent comparisons. To improve, focus on accurately selecting and reporting the key features from the chart, ensure data is correctly interpreted, and provide a clear overview of the main trends. The report falls short of the required 150 words.

The report has a clear overall structure with an introduction, overview, and body paragraphs. However, coherence is sometimes hindered by grammatical errors and awkward phrasing (e.g., 'for the given period were noticed no substantial changes', 'amount the same transport constitude'). The use of cohesive devices is limited, and the progression of ideas could be smoother. To improve, focus on sentence clarity and use a wider range of linking words to connect ideas logically.

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, with some attempts at less common words (e.g., 'constituted', 'utilise'). However, there are several spelling errors ('substsntial', 'wheras', 'constitude', 'approximaly', 'consideretion', 'kilimeters') and inappropriate word choices ('amount the same transport', 'utilise of bicycles'). These errors reduce clarity. To improve, proofread carefully to eliminate spelling errors and ensure that word forms and collocations are correct.

The report contains frequent grammatical errors that affect understanding. There are issues with subject-verb agreement, tense, prepositions, and sentence structure (e.g., 'for the given period were noticed no substantial changes', 'amount the same transport constitude nearly three times as many as was before'). Punctuation is also inconsistent. To improve, focus on basic grammar rules, such as ensuring each sentence has a clear subject and verb, and use a variety of sentence structures accurately.