🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Multiple Graphs

Band 7+: The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image contains two line graphs showing the percentage of population using public and private transport in five Australian cities from 2000 to 2010. For public transport use, the percentages were: Sydney (20% in 2000, 22% in 2003, 21% in 2006, 19% in 2010), Perth (15% in 2000, 16% in 2003, 17% in 2006, 16% in 2010), Adelaide (12% in 2000, 9% in 2003, 11% in 2006, 10% in 2010), Canberra (5% in 2000, 5.5% in 2003, 6% in 2006, 7% in 2010), and Melbourne (10% in 2000, 8% in 2003, 10% in 2006, 10% in 2010). For private transport use, the percentages were: Sydney (10% in 2000, 12% in 2003, 18% in 2006, 25% in 2010), Perth (40% in 2000, 42% in 2003, 45% in 2006, 50% in 2010), Adelaide (82% in 2000, 85% in 2003, 88% in 2006, 90% in 2010), Canberra (40% in 2000, 40% in 2003, 40% in 2006, 42% in 2010), and Melbourne (60% in 2000, 68% in 2003, 75% in 2006, 82% in 2010).
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line charts delineate the figures for the use of public and private transport in five Australian cities, namely Sydney, Adelaide, Perth, Canberra and Melbourne, between 2000 and 2010.

Overall, although the number of people having private cars outweighed that of using public transport throughout the ten-year period, the figures of five cities in Australia remained stable during ten years. There was a large gap in the two categories witnessed in Melbourne, while, in Sydney, these two shared an equal percentage during that time.

To begin with, when it comes to the proportion of population preferring public means of transportation, in 2000, Sydney was the forerunner with 20%, followed by Perth with more than 15%. The other three cities’ figures were below 15%, leading by Adelaide’s of approximately 13%, and the lowest becoming Melbourne with only 5% of the population. While the year 2003 and 2006 exhibited slight fluctuations in those proportions, they did not surpass each other and remained at their range until the end of the period.

Meanwhile, the data of private vehicles’ users in Australian cities appears to witness a wider range, in which the highest line belonged to Melbourne with around 80% while the lowest number was of Sydney ranging from merely 10% to more than 20%. The occupation of Canberra’s residents opting for private transport was around 60 to 80%, which was nearly six times higher than the use of public ones. Following that, this number of Adelaide quadrupled the number representing the choice of public transport, whilst Perth’s doubled and Sydney’s was nearly equal to it. This means that the difference in Melbourne within these two categories remained the largest, with the gap of approximately 75%.

Word Count: 282

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts illustrate the proportions of residents who use public transport and private automobiles in five Australian cities: Sydney, Perth, Adelaide, Canberra and Melbourne between 2000 and 2010. Overall, it is immediately apparent that the percentage of individuals travelling via public transportation shows varied changes, while that of private vehicles witnessed an increase in all […]

The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two given charts illustrate the proportions of residents who use public transport and personal cars in five cities of Australia involving Sydney, Perth, Adelaide, Canberra and Melbourne between 2000 and 2010. Overall, it is immediately apparent that the percentage of travelling via public transportation shows varied changes, while that of private vehicles witnessed an […]

See All

Other Topics:

The charts show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008-2014. Summarize the information and make comparisons where relevant.

The illustration below describes the amount of volunteers by organizations from 2008 to 2014. Overall, it is clear that environment, art,sport and education had the most volunteers, while the other two showed the less results. In 2008 health Care took only 7% of all the organizations and was the most passive one. At this year […]

Writing task 1 The graph below shows the viewership of different TV programs among three different age groups. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart illustrates various TV programs watched by three different groups, such as those aged 10-15, teenagers, and those aged 21-25, to compare the data. Overall, viewing preferences changed noticeably with age. Younger viewers and teenagers preferred sports and drama, while older viewers watched more news. Film was most popular among teenagers, whereas it […]

Writing task 1 The graph below shows the viewership of different TV programs among three different age groups. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie char illustrates about various TV programs which are watched by three different types groups, such as age 10-15, teenagers and age 21-25 to compares the data. Overall, viewing preferences changed noticeably with age. Younger and teenagers views preferred sport and drama, while older age watched more news. Film most popular among people teenagers, […]

The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. Write at least 150 words.

The pi-Chart illustrate the quality of service that provided from Parkway hotel on last 5 years where it cetagorise amoung five cetagorise. In the bigening 2005 from 100 coustomer major 45 percent rated as a Satisfactory level hotel. Among those voting second majority gose to low quality. Where some minor review comes as better but […]

The charts below show the proportion of people’s total spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1998 and 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph compares how much money people spent on various goods and services in one country in Europe two years: 1998 and 2008. Overall, spending on three categories saw a decrease, while that on clothing and electronic goods increased, with eating out remaining unaltered. Of these, electronic goods stood out as being the biggest […]

the graph below show the sources of oil for us in 2012 and the amount of oil it imported between 2005 and 2012

The given graphs provide information regarding the sources of crude oil in 2012 and the amount of its product that was brought into the US from abroad in-between the period of 7 years starting at 2005. Overall, it can be observed that US had the largest crude oil exploitation around the globe. Meanwhile, its oil […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.