Pie Chart

Band 7+: The charts below show the reasons why students in different age categories voted for a particular candidate to be their student representative.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The charts below show the reasons why students in different age categories voted for a particular candidate to be their student representative.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image displays two pie charts. The chart for "Students aged 18–22" shows the following breakdown: Easy to talk to at 32%, Good speaker at 24%, Can handle negotiations at 20%, Can be trusted at 16%, and Knows local traditions at 8%. The chart for "Students aged 23–50" shows this distribution: Can handle negotiations at 26%, Good speaker at 24%, Easy to talk to at 22%, Can be trusted at 22%, and Knows local traditions at 10%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The pie charts depict the proportion of reasons that students voted for one specific candidate to be their representative.

Overall, students aged 18 to 22 mostly vote for people who are easy to talk to and vote the least for those who know local traditions. Students at the age of 23 to 50, meanwhile, vote for trusted students the most and the least for knowing local traditions.

Firstly, for students aged from 18 to 22, most of the votes belong to people who are easy to talk to, which accounts for 32%. In addition, students who are good speakers are also preferred with 26%. Meanwhile, there are 20% of total votes for people who can be trusted, which is 6% lower than those who speak well. Finally, students who can handle negotiations and know local traditions rank lowest, accounting for 15% and 9% respectively.

Secondly, candidates who are easy to talk to, in contrast with the proportion of students aged 18-22, account for 22% of the votes of people aged 23-50 which is also the same as the figure for those who can handle negotiations. Meanwhile, candidates who can be trusted make up for 26% of total votes, making it the highest-voted reason for people from 23 years old to 50 years old. 24% of students aged from 23-50 vote for candidates who speak well, which is ranked second after people who are trusted and higher than those who are easy to talk to and able to handle negotiations. Consequently, candidates who know local traditions account for 10%, which is the lowest figure of this age group

Word Count: 267

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B1 - Intermediate
Using more sophisticated words could be beneficial.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

students: 9

people: 6

which: 5

those: 4

local: 4

trusted: 4

votes: 4

candidates: 4

traditions: 3

meanwhile: 3

handle: 3

negotiations: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report addresses the task and presents an overall trend, but it contains several inaccuracies in the data. For the 18-22 age group, the percentages for 'good speaker' and 'can be trusted' are incorrect (stated as 26% and 20% instead of 24% and 16%), and the percentages for 'can handle negotiations' and 'knows local traditions' are also wrong (stated as 15% and 9% instead of 20% and 8%). For the 23-50 age group, the percentages for 'can be trusted' and 'can handle negotiations' are swapped (stated as 26% and 22% instead of 22% and 26%). These inaccuracies detract from the task achievement. To improve, ensure all data is accurately reported and avoid making unsupported claims, such as stating that 'can be trusted' is the highest for the 23-50 group when it is actually 'can handle negotiations'.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report is generally well-organized with a clear overall statement and separate paragraphs for each age group. However, the flow could be improved by using a wider range of cohesive devices and ensuring smoother transitions between ideas. For example, the phrase 'Firstly' is used, but subsequent points could be linked more effectively. The final sentence of the second paragraph is a bit abrupt and could be better integrated. Overall, the message is easy to follow, but there is room for more sophisticated cohesion.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary used is appropriate and mostly accurate, with some good attempts at paraphrasing (e.g., 'depict the proportion', 'accounts for', 'rank lowest'). However, there is some repetition and a lack of more sophisticated lexical variation. For instance, 'students' and 'candidates' are used repeatedly, and phrases like 'easy to talk to' could be paraphrased. The range of vocabulary is adequate but not fully flexible or natural, and there are minor inaccuracies in word choice (e.g., 'vote for trusted students' could be more precise). Boost vocabulary complexity to elevate the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report demonstrates a good range of grammatical structures, including complex sentences and comparisons. However, there are several grammatical errors and awkward phrasings that affect clarity. For example, 'students at the age of 23 to 50' should be 'students aged 23 to 50', and 'make up for 26%' should be 'make up 26%'. There are also issues with subject-verb agreement and article usage. While the errors do not severely impede understanding, they are noticeable and prevent the report from achieving a higher band score.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the reasons why students in different age categories voted for a particular candidate to be their student representative.

The pie charts illustrate various reasons why students in different age groups voted for a specific candidate to be their student representative. Overall, it can be clearly seen that younger students pay more attention to being easy to talk to and being a good speaker, while older students placed the importance to the negotiation skills […]

Band 6+

The charts below show the reasons why students in different age categories voted for a particular candidate to be their student representative.

The pie charts illustrate various reasons why students in different age groups voted for a specific candidate to be their student representative. Overall, it can be learly seen that younger students pay more attention to being easy to talk to and being a good speaker, while older students placed the importance to the negotiation skills […]

Band 6+

The charts below show the reasons why students in different age categories voted for a particular candidate to be their student representative.

The pie charts demonstrate the causes why students in different age categories 18-22 and 23-50 preferred for a particular candidate to be their student representative. Overall, the best common reason why students aged 18-22 voted was that they can easy to talk to and for learners aged 23-50 is they can be trusted. The least […]

Band 5+

The charts below show the reasons why students in different age categories voted for a particular candidate to be their student representative.

The given two pie charts compare the reasons why students in different age brackets voted for a specific candidate to be their student reprentative. Overall, it is clear that for the younger group the main reason was easy to talk, whereas for elder students were can handle negatiations. In detail, the share of pupils aged […]

Band 5+

See All

The pie charts below show the reasons for visiting public library in a city in 2010 and in 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate how a reasons for visiting a public library in a city and 2010 in 2020. Overall the pie charts show reasons for visiting a public library in a city borrowing books and using computers and Internet have been highest in trend in contrast other, meeting with friends and family, have been […]

Band 4+

The three pie charts show the percentage of total energy consumption from five different sources in 1985, 1995 and 2005.

The three pie charts illustrate the percentages of total energy consumption from five different sources in 1985, 1995 and 2005. Overall, the proportions of energy consumption from gas and natural gas increased over the period, whereas those for renewable energy and nuclear power declined. Oil consumption fluctuated, rising in the first decade before returning to […]

Band 8+

The three pie charts show the percentage of total energy consumption from five different sources in 1985, 1995 and 2005.

1. The pie charts demonstrates of total energy consumption from 5 different sources in 1985, 1995 and 2005 In general, natural gas and gas saw increases of varying degrees but nuclear and renewable energy significantly went down and oil is decreased too In 1985 , gas started at 9 % , it was increased a […]

Band 5+

What public transportation is used in Edmonton and why people use a car in Edmonton.

The pie chart below illustrates the use of different modes of transportation and people’s reasons for car use in Edmonton. Overall, people mostly use cars or light rail transit, and rarely travel by bus or taxi. They commonly use cars to commute to work or business and take children to school, but they often use […]

Band 7+

The charts below give information about players of electronic games in South Korea in 2003. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate the characterictics of game players in South Korea in 2003. Overall, it can be seen that the electronic games were largerly played by males. Additionally, the vast majority of players was under 36 years old. Regarding the types of games, the most popular category was “Actions”, whereas “Others” was the least […]

Band 7+

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium