The given two pie charts compare the reasons why students in different age brackets voted for a specific candidate to be their student reprentative.
Overall, it is clear that for the younger group the main reason was easy to talk, whereas for elder students were can handle negatiations.
In detail, the share of pupils aged 18-24 those who voted for easy to talk accounted for 32%, compared with 22% for students aged 23-50. However, there was a slight difference of one percentage points between 18-24 and 25-50 in terms of local traditions, at 9% and 10% respectively.
Following this trend, the remaining reasons were can be trusted, can handle negotiations, and good speaker. Furthermore, students aged 18-24 who voted to certain candidate in terms of good speaker at 24%, compared with the same proportion for pupils 25-50. Likewise, there was a noticeable difference of 6 percentage points for candidate who can be trusted between 18-24 and 25-50, at 16% and 22%, respectively. Last reason was can handle negotiations with 20% for aged 18-24, and 26% for those who 25-50.
