Line Graph

Band 6+: The graph below shows the amount of time taken to produce a vehicle by four US-based car manufacturers in the years 1998 to 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The graph below shows the amount of time taken to produce a vehicle by four US-based car manufacturers in the years 1998 to 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image displays a graph of vehicle production time (hours per vehicle) from 1998 to 2002 for Nissan, Daimler Chrysler (DC), General Motors (GM), and Ford. In 1998, Nissan shows 36.5 hours, Daimler Chrysler (DC) shows 34 hours, General Motors (GM) presents 28.6 hours, and Ford records 28 hours. By 1999, Nissan drops to 31 hours, DC to 32.5 hours, GM maintains at 28 hours, and Ford at 25.7 hours. In 2000, Nissan decreases further to 27 hours, DC reaches 31 hours, GM falls slightly to 26.5 hours, and Ford drops to 23.5 hours. For 2001, Nissan records approximately 24 hours, DC further declines to 29 hours, GM remains constant around 26.5 hours, and Ford at 23 hours. By 2002, Nissan and Ford both decrease to 22 hours, DC lowers to 27 hours, and GM decreases to 25 hours per vehicle.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graph illustrates the time spent manufacturing vehicles by four car brands located in the United States between 1998 and 2002.

Overall, the amount of time taken to produce cars by manufacturers Nissan, DaimlerChrysler, and General Motors saw a downward trend, while the opposite was true for the fourth manufacturer, Ford.

Turning to the details, car production by Nissan started at 37 hours per vehicle, which was the peak time spent on producing cars. However, the length of time taken to assemble cars went down considerably to 24 hours in 2000, and this was followed by a further drop to 21 hours by the end of the period. DaimlerChrysler and General Motors experienced a similar decline in a simplified format, beginning with 34 hours and ending with 28 hours, and starting with 32 hours and finishing with 24 hours, respectively.

On the other hand, the time demanded for creating vehicles increased slightly, despite a minimal decrease, to approximately 27 hours per car at the end of the period.

Word Count: 169

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

6.5

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
C1 - Intricate
Strive to incorporate even richer and more precise language.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

hours: 8

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report contains significant inaccuracies in data interpretation that affect the overall task achievement. Most notably, the overview incorrectly states that Ford's production time increased, whereas the data shows a downward trend for all four manufacturers. Additionally, the final paragraph fails to identify which manufacturer it is referring to, making the information unclear. To improve, ensure that the trends identified in the overview are consistent with the data presented in the body paragraphs, and always clearly name the subjects you are describing to maintain clarity.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report follows a logical structure with an introduction, overview, and detail paragraphs. However, there is a significant issue with the overview: it incorrectly states that Ford had an upward trend, whereas the data shows Ford's production time actually decreased. This logical error affects the coherence of the entire report. Additionally, the grouping of data in the third paragraph is somewhat confusing due to the phrasing 'in a simplified format,' which is not a standard academic way to describe data presentation. To improve, ensure the overview accurately reflects the general trends and use clearer cohesive devices to link manufacturers.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary used is generally appropriate and varied, with terms like 'illustrates,' 'downward trend,' and 'considerably' used effectively. However, there are some awkward or imprecise uses of language, such as 'the time demanded for creating vehicles' and 'in a simplified format.' Aim for more natural academic collocations, such as 'the time required for production' or 'the time taken to manufacture.' Ensure that the descriptions of trends are precise and match the intended meaning.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The grammatical range is good, with a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. The report is largely free of errors, and punctuation is used correctly. To reach a higher band, focus on ensuring that the complex structures used to compare multiple data points (like the 'respectively' sentence) are perfectly clear and do not become convoluted. The accuracy is high, which is a strong point of this report.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph below shows the amount of time taken to produce a vehicle by four US-based car manufacturers in the years 1998 to 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph compares four different US-based car producers in terms of vehicle manufacturing time between 1998 and 2002, at one-year intervals. Overall, throughout the period, all vehicle manufacturers experienced declines in car production time, albeit to varying degrees. Despite starting the period at an all-time high production time, Nissan witnessed noticeable drops over the […]

Band 7+

The graph below shows the amount of time taken to produce a vehicle by four US-based car manufacturers in the years 1998 to 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph ilustrates the camparsion of number require to produce a vehicle by four US-based car manufactures from 1998 and 2002. Overall, production time most compnies are declined,with nissan showing dramatically improvement. The ford experienced a slightly increase over the period, while the daimler chrysler figures remained relatively stable. In 1998, the nissan recorded the […]

Band 5+

See All

The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line chart illustrates the data of women who were members of parliament for 12 years in five different European nations. It is clearly visible that German females were in lead from starting year 2000 to 2010 , that includes data of 32% in early years which inclined slightly in further years and recorded […]

Band 4+

The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell phones) in a European country from January to September 2002

The line graph illustrates the median monthly contract cost for four different mobile cell phones in a European country between January and September 2002, measured in Euros. Overall, the monthly cost of three mobile cell phones showed an upward trend, albeit to varying degrees, while Alpha experienced a decline by the end of the period. […]

Band 8+

The graph below gives information about the number of jobs in four sectors of the economy in the US between 1960 and 2020.

The given line graph illustrates information about the amount of jobs in four section( manufacturing, Retail, Agriculture and heathcare) of the economy in the US between 1960 and 2020. Overall, it is evident that the Retail and the Healthcare jobs represented a graduall increasing, while Manufacturing and Agriculture followed the opposite trend, that declined steady […]

Band 4+

The graph below shows the average house prices in three countries between the years 1997 and 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The line graph provides the average house prices in three countries from 1997 and 2014. Overall, there were fluctations in the quantities of all the three countries. While Country A generally had higher housing costs, followed by Country B and Country C remain at the bottom, despite a grudual rise in the end of period. […]

Band 4+

The graph below shows the gross domestic products (GDP) in four selected countries between 2010 and 2015

The line chart illustrates how much Gross Domestics Products (GDP) was recorded in four different countries, including Japan, the USA, the UK and China from 2010 to 2015. Overall, Japan was the dominant figure over the period, in completely contrast to the UK’s GDP. Moreover, while both the USA and China witnessed an upward trend, […]

Band 7+

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium