🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 7+: The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays a bar graph illustrating amounts related to three methods of disposal—landfill, burning, dumping in sea—over three years: 2005, 2006, 2008. For 2005: landfill approximately 1950, burning around 1600, and dumping in sea roughly 1100; for 2006: landfill near 1750, burning around 1400, and dumping in sea about 1200; for 2008: landfill approximately 1300, burning around 1200, and dumping in sea roughly 900.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart illustrates the volume of waste disposed of by a European country between 2005 and 2008.

Overall, landfill was the most common method of waste disposal in 2005 and 2006, while dumping waste in the sea became the leading method in 2008.

First and foremost, landfill in 2005 had the highest result across all methods and years, with 2,000,000 kilograms. Burning was nearly 900 tonnes, as well as 1,200 tonnes for dumping in the sea. Also, in 2006, landfill recorded the highest tonnes with 1,600, while dumping in the sea in 2005 was over 1,400 tonnes. However, in 2008, the figures changed more: 1,200 tonnes for the method of landfill, and the same as in 2005, both of them were around 900 tonnes, as well as the highest for this year was dumping in the sea at over 1,600 tonnes.

In addition, it can be seen that landfill stayed almost the same from 2005 to 2007, but it decreased in 2008. In contrast, dumping waste into the sea increased steadily over the period. Burning remained stable and did not change much between 2005 and 2008.

Word Count: 187

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

The graph below given data on waste disposal in a European country over the period from 2005 to 2008. Generally, it is clear that landfill showed the higher reises. However, burning showed the most lowest proportion. In 2005, Landfill was most common method to waste disposal. Also the graph showed high proportion amount in 2000 […]

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates show the disposal of waste in a European country between 2005 and 2008. For landfill, the amount of disposal waste maximum in 2005 and it was 2000 million tones, followed by 2008 and amount was 1750 million tonesand lowest in 2006 and it was 1600 million tones. For buring, maximum amounts of […]

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

In this report i am going to describe the graph that illustrates the ratio of waste disposal in european country from 2005 to 2008. In 2005 the highest waste disposal is conducted by landfill that is 2000 million tonnes. burning waste is 900 million in 2005 and the waste that is dumping in the sea […]

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

The given graph illustrates the amount of waste disposal by using three methods in a European country from 2005 to 2008. It is clear that using method of landfilling was the highest at the beginning of the period but dumping in the sea took the lead last year. In 2005, about 2000 million tons of […]

See All

Other Topics:

The bar chart below shows the percentage of household income spent on six categories (food, housing, transport, education, entertainment, and healthcare) by three different income groups. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the household income expenditure on six particular categories (food, housing, transport, education, entertainment, and healthcare) by three various income groups (low, middle, high-income). Overall, it is clear that lower-income households allocate a significantly larger percentage of the basic needs such as food, and housing. In stark contrast, higher-income […]

The chart below shows library borrowing in UK public libraries during a 10-year period from 1995 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the number of books borrowed from public libraries in Uk between 1995 and 2005. Overall adult fiction, adult nonfiction, children’s bosks and top auto-visual materials followed similar downward trends. The significant change was observed by children’s book and top auto-visual materials. Focusing on the biggest changes first, these were children’s book […]

Frequency of eating at fast food restaurants among people in the USA (2003, 2006, 2013).

The bar chart presented data regarding how many people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants from 2003 to 2013. Overall, eating fast food once a week and once or twice a month were the most common habits during the period, whereas eating it every day or never eating it were the least common […]

The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the number of teaching hours per year completed by teachers in Japan, Spain, Ireland, and the USA in 2001. Overall, teachers in the USA spent the most time teaching across all three educational levels. By contrast, Japan recorded the lowest figures overall. Primary school teaching hours were identical in Japan, Spain, […]

The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates teaching time in hours per year in Japan, Spain, Ireland and USA in 2001. Overall, US demonstrates highest level on every teacher. Meanwhile, other three countries had same outcome in primary. Lower Secondary in Spain and Japan same, but in other another number of teching hours. Upper Secondary had only different […]

The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the number of teaching hours per year by each teacher across four different nations in the year 2001. In general, it is noticeable that different trends were observed in all the given countries. While USA recorded was the most common group among all the given trends, the opposite was true for […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.