🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 7+: The line graph compares the number of burglaries in four different countries of Europe over a 9 – year.

Image for topic: The line graph compares the number of burglaries in four different countries of Europe over a 9 – year.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image shows a line graph depicting burglary rates per thousand in Great Britain, Sweden, France, and Norway from 2000 to 2009. Great Britain starts at approximately 20 in 2000, peaks at about 21 in 2001, shows fluctuations, and ends at roughly 17 in 2009. Sweden starts just above 5, peaks at around 15 in 2004, dips slightly, peaks again at around 18 in 2006, and ends at approximately 14 in 2009. France starts at about 6, shows a steady rise to 12 in 2009. Norway starts at approximately 5, displays slight fluctuations, and ends just above 2 in 2009.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graph illustrates the number of burglaries, measured in thousands, recorded in four European countries – Great Britain, Greece, Spain and Hungary – over a nine-year period from 2000 to 2009.

Overall, Great Britain consistently experienced the highest burglary rates throughout the period, despite noticeable fluctuations. In contrast, Hungary recorded the lowest figures for most years. While burglary levels in Greece showed a clear upward trend, Spain generally saw a decline after an initial rise.

In Great Britain, burglary numbers began at around 16 thousand in 2000 and rose sharply to approximately 20 thousand in 2002. This figure then fell to about 15 thousand by 2004 before climbing again to a second peak of roughly 20 thousand in 2006. From that point onwards, the trend reversed, with numbers gradually decreasing to around 15 thousand by 2009.

Greece started with comparatively modest figures of about 7 thousand burglaries in 2000. After remaining relatively stable in the early years, the rate increased steadily from 2004 onwards, reaching approximately 12 thousand by the end of the period, making it the second-highest among the four countries in 2009.

Spain followed a different pattern. Burglaries rose from around 6 thousand in 2000 to a peak of about 8 thousand in 2003, after which the figures declined steadily, falling to roughly 4 thousand by 2009. Hungary consistently recorded the lowest levels, fluctuating slightly between 5 and 7 thousand throughout the period, with no significant long-term change.

Word Count: 241

Answers On The Same Topic:

The line graph compares the number of burglaries in four different countries of Europe over a 9 – year.

The graph below gives information about burglaries per thousands in Great Britain,Greece,Spain,Norway between 2000 and 2009 it is clear from the graph that the line made in Great Britain,Greece percentage of overall burglaries was high during this period,while Spain,Norway ,percentage of overall burglaries was low during this time According to what is shown in the […]

The line graph compares the number of burglaries in four different countries of Europe over a 9 – year.

Overall, the chart shows number of burglaries for every 1000, comparing between 4 countries: Great Britian, Greece, Spain, and Hungary, between 9 years. Firstly, Great Britian leads in the field of house related crimes with the number fluctuating in between 15 and 20. Starting in 2000 at about 16, increasing significantly to peaking at 20 […]

The line graph compares the number of burglaries in four different countries of Europe over a 9 – year.

The information about bulgaries per thousand in four countries between 2000 and 2009 is depicted by line graph. The data is shown in numbers. Overall, there is increasing trend of bulgaries in Greece during given period. Meanwhile, there is gradually decreasing rate in other three countries during the given period. The data of great Britain […]

The line graph compares the number of burglaries in four different countries of Europe over a 9 – year.

The line graph illustrates how many burglaries happened in four countries, over a nine period between 2000 and 2009. Overall, it is clear that burglaries decreased slightly in Great Britain, Spain, and Norway, while they increased in Greece during this period. In Great Britain, burglaries started at around 15,000 in 2000 and remained stable in […]

See All

Other Topics:

The line graph shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The data illustrates overseas visitors to three several areas in a European country from 1987 to 2007. Overall, proportion of people who visited to the coasts and lakes increased substantially, but with some flactuations, over the period, . The mountains visitors also rose, although the increase was considerably less pronounced. At the first half of […]

The line graph shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph compares the changes in the number of tourists visiting European country areas in a 20-year period starting from 1987. Overall, all three visiting lands gained popularity over the time, ending with the coast dominance, followed by the lakes and the mountains. While the figure for the coast and the lakes had […]

The line graph show the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The line graph illustrates the average weekly number of patients visiting four different clinics at a hospital between 2010 and 2016. Overall, the eye clinic experienced by far the most substantial growth and became the busiest clinic by 2016. In contrast, the birth-control clinic fluctuated considerably, although its figure returned to its initial level at […]

The line graph show the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The line graph illustrates the average number of patients visiting four clinics at a hospital each week between 2010 and 2016. Overall, the eye clinic experienced by far the most substantial growth and became the hospital’s busiest clinic by 2016. By contrast, the birth-control clinic fluctuated considerably, although it ended at approximately the same level […]

The graph below show the percentage of people in one country who accessed the news from four resources from 1995 , with projections to 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

The line graph illustrates changes in the proportion of citizens in a particular nation who accessed the news through four media platforms from 1995 to the present, with future projections up to 2025. Overall, the period is characterized by a dramatic shift in news consumption habits. The Internet experienced an exponential rise and is expected […]

The graph below shows the results of a survey among online adults on their use of various social media in the USA between 2012 and 201 5.

The line graph illustrates the usage of different websites, namely Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Twitter, by adults in the United States from 2012 to 2015. The percentage of people using all the websites showed a slight, steady increase during the 4 years, except for LinkedIn, which showed a mild decline starting in 2014. Facebook […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.