Table

Band 5+: The pie charts below show the distribution of energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany and France in 2010

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The pie charts below show the distribution of energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany and France in 2010

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image lists energy source percentages for two countries in 2010. For Germany (2010), the data is: Coal 40%, Natural Gas 25%, Nuclear 20%, Renewable 10%, and Other 5%. For France (2010), the data is: Coal 20%, Natural Gas 15%, Nuclear 45%, Renewable 15%, and Other 5%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

This pie chart shows us distribution of energy sources in Germany and France for 2010. It consist of coal, natural gas, nuclear, renewable and other. Now, I will discuss and compare each category of this chart.

Highest rate in Germany is distribution of coal (40%) and in France is using of nuclear (45%). Lowest in both countries are other types of energy sources (5%). Percentage of coal using in France is two times less (20%) than in Germany. Renewable sources are almost similar in both countries, however in France is higher for 5% (15%) while in Germany is only (10%). The last section is natural gas which is 25% in Germany and 15% in France.

By this pie chart we can see that the most common type of energy resources in both countries are renewable energy and other sources. Although, France distributes more nuclear than Germany and Germany distributes more coal than France.

Word Count: 153

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B1 - Intermediate
Using more sophisticated words could be beneficial.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

germany: 7

france: 6

energy: 4

sources: 4

nuclear: 3

renewable: 3

other: 3

countries: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report identifies some key features and makes some comparisons, but it lacks overall structure and depth. The organization could be improved by grouping information more logically (e.g., discussing each energy source across both countries in turn). The conclusion is not strongly supported by the data presented and contains inaccuracies. To improve, focus on providing a clearer overview, more precise comparisons, and a more accurate and insightful conclusion.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report lacks a clear structure and logical flow. The introduction is weak, and the body paragraphs jump between different energy sources and countries without clear transitions. The conclusion is repetitive and doesn't offer a strong summary or insight. To improve coherence, use topic sentences to introduce the main point of each paragraph, and use transition words to connect ideas between sentences and paragraphs. For example, you could dedicate separate paragraphs to comparing each energy source between the two countries or discussing each country separately. Also, avoid starting sentences with 'Now' or 'The last section is'. These phrases are not appropriate for academic writing.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary used is basic and lacks precision. There is over-reliance on simple words like 'using', 'higher', and 'common'. To improve, try to use a wider range of vocabulary to describe the data and comparisons. For example, instead of 'using of nuclear', you could say 'nuclear energy consumption' or 'reliance on nuclear power'. Instead of 'higher', you could use 'greater' or 'larger'. Also, avoid informal language like 'shows us'. Use more formal alternatives such as 'illustrates' or 'presents'. Boost vocabulary complexity to elevate the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report contains several grammatical errors, including incorrect verb tenses ('It consist'), incorrect article usage ('This pie chart shows us distribution'), and awkward phrasing ('Percentage of coal using'). There are also issues with sentence structure and word order. To improve, carefully proofread your work for grammatical errors and pay attention to subject-verb agreement, article usage, and correct tense usage. Practice using a variety of sentence structures to improve the flow and clarity of your writing. Consider using a grammar checker to identify and correct errors, but always review the suggestions critically.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The pie charts below show the distribution of energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany and France in 2010

This pie chart illustrates the energy sources consumed by Germany and France for electricity generation in the period of 2010. Overall, it is seen that both two countries used coal, natural gas and nuclear the most to generate electricity. As for Germany, coal was the biggest source of power generation with 45% of total distribution […]

Band 6+

The pie charts below show the distribution of energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany and France in 2010

The pie charts below illustrate the proportion how the sources of energy have been allocated in France and Germany that used for electrical supplies in 2010. Overall, the usage of coal has been the highest in Germany, whereas in France the used of nuclear has been the highest peak throughout the year. To begin with, […]

Band 5+

The pie charts below show the distribution of energy sources used for electricity generation in Germany and France in 2010

The pie chart present a comparison of allocation for electricity generation patterns between Germany and France in 2010, focusing on five major energy sources, including coal, natural gas, nuclear, renewable, and other. Overall, coal accounted for the largest proportion of energy resources in Germany, while in France nuclear was significantly the biggest material composition. The […]

Band 6+

See All

The table shows the percentage of household with electronic goods in New Zealand in 1997 and 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given table illustrates information about the proportion of household with electronic items in New Zealand, presenting data for six different categories across 1997 and 2002 Overall, it is evident that television was increased in almost every house in New Zealand, whereas Washing Machine showed no change during the period. Looking at the details, Personal […]

Band 6+

The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010.

The given table indicates the export values of five product categories between 1997 and 2010. Overall, it is obvious that the export values experienced an upward trend in most categories, while the figures for clothing and manufacturing exhibited a reverse pattern. In addition, equipment and telecommunication constituted the highest revenues throughout the surveyed period. Equipment […]

Band 8+

The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010.

The given table indicates the export values of five products categories between 1997 and 2010 Overall, It is obvious that the export values experienced an upward trend in most categories while the figures for clothing and manufacturing exhibited a reverse pattern. In addition, equipment and telecommunication consititued the highest revenues throughout the surveyed period. Equipment […]

Band 7+

The charts below show response to a questionnaire given by two groups of people (Club members and the general public) who showed their opinions about a new theatre

The tables illustrate data based on survey responses of participants in the club and the audience to a newly constructed theatre. The questionnaire compares opinions on production quality, information about the plays/performances to the public, and facilities in the theatre. It is clear that the vast majority of people surveyed are completely satisfied with the […]

Band 7+

The table below gives information about mangement posiotions held by women in a European country in 2006. summarise the information by selecting ard reporting the main features. and make comparsions where relevant.

The table compares the percentages of women occupying three levels of management across four different industries in a European nation in 2006. Overall, the hospitality industry recorded the highest proportions of women at all three management levels, whereas manufacturing consistently had the lowest figures. Across the four industries, managers accounted for higher percentages than executive […]

Band 9

The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.

The table provides information about the usage of rail transportation if four distinct countries in 2007. Overall, while China was the dominant country in passenger travel, Canada presented the opposite, leading in cargo volume. In contrast, Malaysia and the UAE displayed virtually identical figures across all categories. Regarding passenger travel, China dominated the category with […]

Band 9

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium