24 Hours Only: Get 39% OFF on Our Premium Plan - Check Out Now!
Line Graph

Band 7+: This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image depicts a line graph titled "Recycling Rate for Selected Materials: 1982-2010," showing the percentage of Paper & cardboard, Glass containers, Aluminum cans, and Plastics recycled in an unnamed country over 28 years. The recycling rates in 1982 were approximately 20% for Paper & cardboard, 10% for Glass containers, 5% for Aluminum cans, and 0% for Plastics. By 2010, the rates increased to 80% for Paper & cardboard, 50% for Glass containers, 70% for Aluminum cans, and 10% for Plastics, with the highest increase observed in Aluminum cans, and Plastics starting from zero while others were already being recycled. Paper & cardboard consistently had the highest recycling rate throughout the period.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The aforementioned line graph delineates the rate of four recycled materials between 1982 and 2010 in a specific country.

Overall, it is discernible that an upward trajectory was generally recorded throughout the period displayed, albeit with some oscillations in both papers & cardboard and Glass containers. Another noteworthy observation is that while paper & cardboard and glass containers held the lion’s share in the recycling rate, aluminium underwent the most robust surge in the displayed period.

Initially, in 1982, paper & cardboard took the lead in the recycling proportion, standing at around 65%, which was 15% higher than that of glass containers. Neither aluminium cans nor plastics barely recorded any major changes. In the 8 ensuing years, there was no shift recorded in paper & cardboard, while a moderate decrease of 10% was registered in the figure of glass containers. The other remaining categories never surpassed 10%.

In 1994, an acceleration of 15% was witnessed in the recycling rate of paper & cardboard, after which point a steep decline of 10% occurred by the conclusion of the period, whereas glass containers bounced back to its starting point, constituting a modest 50%, which eventually rose to 60%. The proportion of aluminum cans recycled accounted for 15% in 1994, followed by a robust increase of 25% at the end of the examined period. In stark contrast, a minor growth was registered in the recycling percentage of plastics, making up for above 10% during the whole displayed period.

Word Count: 245

Answers On The Same Topic:

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph compares the percentages of recycled materials, namely paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics in a specific nation between 1982 and 2010. Overall, all categories experienced an upward trend. However, aluminium cans grew the fastest throughout. It is also noticeable that paper and cardboard were recycled the most throughout […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The line graph presents data on how the recycling rates of four different materials namely paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plasticsbchanged over a period from 1982 to 2010 in one country. Overall, paper and cardboard consistently had the highest recycling rates throughout the period, despite a slight decline after a peak in […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the recycling rates of four distinct materials in an unnamed country from 1982 to 2010. Overall, the data indicate substantial growth in recycling rates for most materials, particularly aluminum cans, while plastics exhibited the least progress during the observed period. In 1982, the recycling rates for paper and cardboard stood at […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The data illustrate the percentage of goods that have been recycled in four different materials over the interval between 1982 and 2010. Overall, the amount of goods recycled has increased, albeit at different rates in each material. At the beginning, the least recycled products, such as aluminum and plastics, were seen to rise in recycle […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the recycling rates of four materials – paper & cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics from 1982 to 2010 in a particular location. Overall, recycling rates for three materials improved significantly, while the rate for plastics remained unchanged over two decades. Initially, paper & cardboard and glass containers had the […]

See All

Other Topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received bu the tourist information office in one cityover a six month period in 2011

The line graph illustrates data about the number of enquiries received by the tourist information centre in a particular city over a six month period in the year 2011. Overall, it is evident that there are three ways to submit an enquiry. Receiving enquiries in person made up the largest figure, as opposed to by […]

The graph above shows the stock price of four technology companies between 2011 and 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The data displays the stock price of technology companies, Facebook, appel, google and yahoo from 2011 to 2016. Overall, Google had stability on the stock price during that period, in addtion appel had instability on the stock price compared to yahoo had decrease gradualy, in contrast facebook had increase gradualy during that period comparing to […]

the line graph gives data abt the number(million) of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008

The line graph depicts data of internet usage measured in millions of users,in five types of commuication services in a ten-year duration between 1998 and 2008. Generally, there is a rise in internet utilization noticed in all the types of internet services in that period of time with Cellular phone service leading the trend. Being […]

The graph shows the Japanese average monthly salary (Yen) from 1953 to 1983, and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period

The line graph compares the price of the color TV, price of black and white TV, and the salary of a typical Japanese per month, measured in Yen. The data covers a 30-year period from 1953 to 1983. Overall, it is clear that both of the prices of color TV and black and white TV […]

UK population aged over 4 who engaged with radio and television at different times from October to December 1992.

The line chart illustrates the precentage of people over 4 years old who intracted with radio and television at varied times from October to December in 1992. Overall, there was an obvious different during the day, people prefered to use the television late at night while in the early morning listen to the news and […]

The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1979 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words

The chart gives information about changes of greens and sweets,fizzy drinks price from1979 to 2009. Overall,the line graph shows upward trend.The price of fresh fruits and vegetables have been rising steadily between 1979-2009.Meanwhile carbonated drinks have the lowest increase. The peak of price for greens and fresh fruits occurred in2007 with around 300-350.dollars.Unfortunately the price […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible and free for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
1000+ IELTS Tests & Samples
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & Content
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
279,000₫ 157,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 5,233₫/ngày)
819,000₫ 397,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 4,411₫/ngày)
1,649,000₫ 667,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 3,706₫/ngày)
3,299,000₫ 857,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 2,381₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.