🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 6+: This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparison where relevant.

Image for topic: This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparison where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays recycling rates (percentages) for paper & cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans, and plastics from 1982 to 2010. Paper & cardboard: 1982 at 65%, rises to 80% in 1990, peaks at 81% in 1994, then declines to 70% by 2010. Glass containers: 1982 at 50%, dips to 40% in 1990, recovers to 60% by 2010. Aluminum cans: 1982 at 2%, steadily increases to 45% by 2010. Plastics: negligible at 1982, increases slowly to 8% by 2010. Each material follows a distinct trend over the period, indicating varying recycling progress.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The given graph illustrates the percentages of recycling rate from four different materials (paper & cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics) in a country between 1982 and 2010. Units are measured in percent.

Overall, it can clearly be seen that paper & cardboard were the highest material that were recycled throughout the given period. Moreover, plastics had the lowest recycling rate over the year.

In terms of paper & cardboard with the highest level of recycling, it started at around 65% in 1982. Then, it fluctuated until 1994 reached a peak at 80% precisely in 1994. After that, it decreased significantly to 70 at the end of period. In 1982, half of glass containers were recycled, however, it slightly dropped at 40% in 1990. Then, it was a gradual rose around 60% in 2010.

Regarding to the other types of materials, aluminium cans stood at just around 5%. It significantly went up around just 45% in 2010. In addition, plastics just started recycling in 1990 approximately 2% that there was not significant increasing just below 10% at the end of the period.

Word Count: 183

Answers On The Same Topic:

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparison where relevant.

The given line graph demonstartes the number of recycling rate for selected of four various materials in particular country between 1982 and 2010. Overall, it can be seen that, the proportion of paper and carboard material which have recycled was the highest percenatge, while the least percentage was recycling of plastics. In detail, paper and […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparison where relevant.

The given line graph illustrates information about recycled rate of four materials- paper and cardboard,glass containers,alumininium cans, and plastics from 1982 to 2010.Overall,it can be observed that the paper and cardboard had by far the highest recycling rates,throughout the period,despite a gradual decline after the mid-1990.In contrast,plastics remained the least recycled material,showing only a slight […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparison where relevant.

This data compares the percentage of four distinct materials that underwent recycling in one country from 1982 to 2010. Across 28 years, paper and cardboard started at around 65 percent and had a fluctuating recycling rate. Conversely, glass containers decreased in the first 8 years and then rose. Whilst aluminium cans started in 1986 at […]

This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparison where relevant.

This data compares the percentage of four distinct materials that underwent recycling in one country from 1982 to 2010. Across 28 years, paper and cardboard started at around 65 percent and had fluctuating recycling rate. Conversely, Glass containers decreased in the first 8 years and rose. Whilst the aluminium cans started in 1986 at around […]

See All

Other Topics:

The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2003 (4 age groups) Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given graph illustrates the proportion of different age groups visiting the cinema once a month or more from 1984 to 2003. Overall, what is most striking when looking at the data is that the percentage of all age groups increased remarkably, with the most substantial rise in 15-24. Additionally, the age group from 15-24 […]

The chart below shows the percentage of households with different kinds of technology in the UK from 1997 to 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph represents the rate of households in the UK owning five different electronic gadgets between 1997 and 2001. Overall, all the technologies showed the increase all over the period. Despite the growth of various gadgets, CD player and telephone composed the highest measures. In 1997, DVD player stood roughly at 27%, which was […]

The chart below shows the percentage of households with different kinds of technology in the UK from 1997 to 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates the percentage of households with different types of technology in the UK between 1997 and 2001. Overall, it is true that the illustration provides the development of the percentage of the different households. CD player was widely used at the beginning and it demonstrated the highest proportion among other kinds of technology […]

The graph illustrates trendsin music buying habits between 2011 and 2018.

The presented line graph depics the trends in music purchasing hobbies from streams, downloads, CDs over the period of seven years, starting from 2011. Overall, it is evident that the trends in stream witnessed an upward trend, the opposite was true for downloads and CDs. Remarkably, CDs was the most popular trend in music habits […]

THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THREE COUNTRIES FROM 1990 TO 2004

The given graph represents the less opportunity ratio of people in the three nations UK, USA and Japan from1990 to 2004 0ver the duration of 14 years and unit is measured in the percentage. As an overall trend, it can be seen that the the ratio of unemployment in Japan decreased from the 1990 to […]

The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph compares the percentage of households owning autos in the UK, over the 36-year period from 1971 to 2007. Overall, families without one car witnessed a substantial decline, whereas those with a car recorded little overall change. Additionally, an upward trend was shown by the rate of two-or-more-cars ownership. Nearly half of British […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.