Living in person or in a nuclear family is assumed to be an increased trend in society in view of countries’ development. From my perspective not only does this phenomenon spur benefits but also downsides to both groups.
On the one hand, individuals encompassing adults in most generations follow celibacy owing to the competition stemming from the workforce in the contemporary era. In fact, the worldwide proliferation leads to the high quality training, which results in an increase in numbers of elite workers, thereby provoking competitive employment. Thus, solo life is conducive to maximizing the scope for greatly concentrating on moving up to the career ladder. Regardless of this advantage, those will confront loneliness after retirement. A prime example is Ho Chi Minh, the prominent Vietnamese resident, dedicating his lifetime for the liberation during the Vietnamese resistance war against French colonialism. This event is a big step in the development of Vietnam. Nevertheless, he was single until passing away at the age of 79.
When it comes to small family units, there is a prevalent increased trend in the community due to the emergence of various problems in families which include the older generations and the younger one. In view of having different exposure to lives, their ideal and conception are converse, resulting in the conflict between these. Hence, nuclear families become the solution to tackle this challenging task. However, it would trigger a distant barrier among family members if this trend prolonged. One piece of evidence for this is the number of Vietnamese young adults moving out after getting married, rather than living together with their family, according to The Youth Press.
In conclusion, living individually or in small family units is a phenomenon in the community at the present on account of countries’ growth spurs advantages and disadvantages at the same time. I indicate two primary factors that it depends on the world situation and matters in families containing significant members.