“In recent years, an increasing number of individuals face challenges when purchasing a house – which is a fundamental human need. Some people believe that the government has a responsibility to provide free housing for those who cannot afford it. In my view, I disagree with the aforementioned assertion due to several reasons.
To begin with, the idea of providing free housing for people struggling with housing is not an ideal solution. Indeed, in the initial period of applying this solution, it might appear to resolve the issue as people will have a house and will not need to work harder to earn money. However, after a while, people could become dependent on the government. Consequently, the authorities will have to allocate a larger budget to address new issues that arise. For example, individuals who have free housing may become lethargic and rely on others, or even the authorities, for their livelihood. They may choose to live a sedentary lifestyle, quit their jobs, and become unemployed, forcing the government to provide for them.
The second reason is that the national budget is not unlimited. If more and more people require free housing, an immense amount of money will be needed for this purpose. This would result in a reallocation of funds from other important areas. As a result, an imbalance in the community will occur. For instance, to secure sufficient funds for housing, certain grants, such as those for education and agricultural production, among others, may see a decline in funding. In other words, the government may not have enough resources to address other critical issues, leading to a myriad of health and societal problems.
In conclusion, housing constitutes a fundamental aspect of life, providing individuals with a place to work, eat, relax, and perform various other functions. However, it is not a sound idea for the government to provide free housing for everyone in need, as this may lead to undesirable consequences, including dependency and a strain on the national budget.”