IT IS OFTEN ARGUED THAT TOWNS HAVE SOME CREATIVE THINGS, WHICH CAN ATTRACT CITIZENS AND THE TOURIST FROM OVERSEAS. IN MY OPINION, I PARTIALLY AGREE WITH THAT BECAUSE THE IMPORTANT BASIC NEEDS AS CRUCIAL AS THE LAYOUT OF CITIES.
THE FIRST AND FOREMOST REASON WHY I AGREE WITH THE STATEMENT IS THAT IT CAN BOOST THE ECONOMY OF THAT CITY AND CREATE SOME EMPLOYMENT IN THE TOWN. TO PUT IT DIFFERENTLY, IN THE CURRENT WORLD, THE TOURISM IS THE ONE OF THE GREAT WAYS TO CREATE JOBS AS WELL AS HELP TO BRING OVERSEAS TOURISTS TO THE TOWN FOR EXPLORATION. DUE TO THIS ADVANCEMENT THE LOCAL PEOPLE CAN EASILY SURVIVE AND IT HELPS THEM TO COME OUT FROM FINANCIAL BURDEN, ALSO IF MORE AND MORE PEOPLE VISIT THAT TOWN, THE GOVERNMENT CAN PROVIDE BETTER FACILITIES BY THE TOURISM INCOME.
ON THE OTHER HAND, THE MAJOR REASON BEHIND MY DISAGREEMENT IS THE LACK OF FUNDS FOR BASIC NEEDS SUCH AS EDUCATION AND HEALTHCARE AND MAY BE THE INCREASING AMOUNT OF CRIME. ALTHOUGH THE PROVIDED FUNDS FOR BUILDING ATTRACTIVE THINGS HELP TO CREATE SOME INCOME, IT IS A MAJOR CONCERN THE RATIO OF CRIMES WILL INCREASE. FURTHER, IF THE GOVERNMENT SPEND A HUGE PROPORTION OF MONEY TO RENOVATE HISTORICAL MONUMENTS OR BUILD NEW FACILITIES, THE CITIZENS OF THAT CITY MAY NOT GET THE BASIC AMENITIES SUCH AS EDUCATION, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND HEALTHCARE AS WELL.
TO CONCLUDE, BEING DEVELOPING CITIES, THEY SHOULD SPEND AMPLE AMOUNTS OF MONEY ON THE RESTORATION AND PROVIDE TYPES OF FACILITIES, WHICH CAN ATTRACT LOCAL AS WELL AS FOREIGN TOURISTS, BUT IF THEY DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT MONEY TO SPEND ON IMPORTANT NEEDS. SO, IT IS NOT WORTH IT FOR THE FUTURE.