Offline museums necessity has become a highly debated issue in contemporary discourse. While in the past days, indispensability archival materials were stored physically in museums. Therefore, in this days, by clicking the buttons in the internet individuals can explore civilizational treasures in online format and leading to no need for museums. However, I firmly disagree with this notion, as only with physical touch individuals can obtain specific documentation about the ancient tools and lead to economic growth.
The foremost reason why museums has significant influence to people rather than discovering it modernly is that physical protection of real artifacts is beneficial in order to get deep knowledge. In other words, by smelling, touching, and feeling the atmosphere of heritage institutions, the documentaries will be in memory for a long-term. For example, as the role-model of scientists Albert Einstein confirmed, the best way of keep in mind the construction of item is that touching it and just feeling by fingers. Consequently, museums are the best option to get to know more about ancient heritage.
Beyond protection, traditional museums attract at least a million tourists annually, and generate a huge income to increase in economic aspect of country. More specifically, modern hi-tech exploration cannot replace the real-world economic impact. For instance, when visitors travel to see the nations heritage such as Napoleon’s crown which often displayed in the Louvre Museum, they also spend money on hotels, nutrition, and transportation making an increase on development of country.
In conclusion, while digital technology revolutionized the access to information, it cannot supplant the unique education, emotion, and cultural contribution of museums.