The statement says that the loss of animals is natural process( it happened before with some species like dinosaurs, dodos and so on). Also ,it said that it is not people’s responsibility to protect wild animals. In my opinion, its wrong, because we are more depended on animal than we can even imagine.
It is true that the process of disappearance is normal for animals and plants. However the statistics say that nowadays this percentage is higher than the scientist were expecting. The researchers supposed that only 10% of species are expecting to be lost in million years. The opposite is happening now, as people are driving wild animals to extinction with the development of agriculture, economy and etc. If it was not people that plummet the number of rare animals, it would not been argued whether we should protect animals or not.
The reason why I think people should help animals with annihilation is that our lives directly connected with wildlife. There is thing called food chain where one specie feeds on other, and when one specie goes it will lead to loss of other species. And this chain we have an essential role is we are able to keep safe animals and plants. For instance, nowadays people are obsessed with material goods rather than environmental benefits. But we can change it; if we provide coexistence, then it will not cost many species.
In conclusion, although people consider that they do not have a role in the distraction of animals’ lives, they are more villains than witness. The key answers is to keep animals safe and not to involve them into human affairs