It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In this status quo, there is a widely-held perception that boosting a balanced lifestyle among inhabitants should take precedence over treating existing patients in order to impede sickness. While some raise concerns regarding the humaneness, I hold a firm belief that this phenomenon renders more merits.
On the one hand, some opponents may insist that spending funds for promoting a wholesome way of living only is cruel for already patients. They reckon that there are many patients who are unable to cover the hospital’s fee due to old age or poverty. Hence, adrifting them without any assistance is an irresponsible decision of the government. However, it is partially accurate as they just consider one side of the issue. By this I mean, there are many diseases that are incurable like cancer or leukemia, seeming hopeless for those who suffer from them. Thus, it would put a heavy strain on the authority if they have to continuously pay for these patients, which is an amount of money wasted.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that the government budgets should be allocated to raising citizens’ awareness of centering more on their well-being. Chief of this is that keeping healthy would be a key element to hampering certain shortcomings and prolonging dwellers’ lifespan. Unequivocally, those who are cognitive to keep fit would refrain from maintaining some detrimental habits and activities. Consequently, it would descent the mortality rates and alleviate the authority’s concerns about healthcare. Another justification is that if people are aware of the pivotal role of this, the environmental issues will be tackled. By this I mean, in order to pursue the healthy lifestyle, people would be captivated by utilizing some eco-friendly items and reducing the use of plastic products, which is more appropriate in eradicating negative impacts on their health.
In conclusion, in light of the aforementioned points, I reaffirm that the concerns about prioritizing the healthy lifestyle rather than treating people who are already ill is a narrow view and the state should better spending money to encourage residents following a balanced lifestyle.