It is clear that planes produce a large among toxic gases which vehicles produce them in a number of years, and can exaggerate air pollution. Several families consider, non-essential flights should be decreased more than travelling by cars. While I agree with idea below in that it can help human beings to reduce the threat of air pollution, I also disagree with this due to its impact on some countries’ touristic industries.
On the one hand, by abandoning these kinds of flight, authorities may take advantage. That is to say, as we know that planes consume a large among of fuel and produce as much as harmful gases that can contaminate the condition of the atmosphere by the toxic in them. If this trend is followed by most communities, we will not see more these types of planes on the sky; besides, by this effort, humanity will prevent the risk of one of the tremendous problems around the world.
On the other hand, although following this structure may assist people to preserve quality of the air, the tourism industry might become bankrupt. In simpler terms, if flights to certain countries abandoned, the numbers of tourists could also diminish. Afterward, tourists from other nations will visit there extremely less than before, and the museums and historical places for example, may lose their priorities among the society. For this reason, dwindling certain travels via airplanes might bring serious disadvantages to nations’ business.
In conclusion, while diminishing flights to travels may assist humanity with depleting the pollution, a number of touristic companies may take disadvantage in this circumstance.