Taking long journeys by airplanes can contaminate the air rather than by automobiles, and so flights ought to be banned rather that limiting car travels, except for important ones. I totally agree with this view because of several suitable reasons, which I will discuss in my essay.
The first reason for my agreement is that planes can emit much gases than traditional transports. That is to say, as planes are huge in their size, they demand more power to move and fly. The fulfill the power these transports need to consume much fuels and emit the same amounts of gases, which include carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is one of the most dangerous gases and can easily damage the atmosphere. In the United Sates, for instance, since the flying is the common and normal travelling system for societies, the appeal to planes more than other transports, and this trend has resulted air pollution. This suggests that if individuals use planes more, they may exacerbate the pollution.
The second reason for my agreement is that, if people do not make use of airlines for non-essential reasons, the number of crushes on air may also decrease. In simpler terms, as we know that due to the one serious mistake during the flight, there would be huge catastrophic crushes may be occurred and a plethora of passengers in airplanes may also get serious injuries or pass away immediately. Taking the plane which come from Kazakhstan and made its way to Russia into account, it was not an important flight and as one bird stuck in planes’ engine, it fell down; a large number of passengers in it passed away in this catastrophe. This illustrates that non-essential flight may also prevent from certain treats.
In conclusion, some people consider that airlines should be banned. I completely agree with this view, in that this trend not only can diminish the air pollution, but it also depletes the numbers of air crushes.