In this contemporary era, healthcare is fundamental for everyone. A debate exists around whether healthcare should be free for all or if individuals should pay for medical services. This essay will clarify the advantages and disadvantages of free healthcare and present an argument on whether it should be universally free.
Highlighting the brighter side of this trend, healthcare is essential for everyone. Furthermore, nowadays, several individuals are not financially capable, so the government provides medical healthcare for poor people and governs the nation. For example, the Civil Hospital offers valuable medical services that are very useful for individuals. However, people pay the tax and follow other payment requirements of the nation, so people should get the free healthcare services.
Apart from this, people fully rely on several medical facilities and lose their financial stability. In addition, people use the facilities from the government without any payment, and that also affects the nation’s economic growth. However, people are incapable of fulfilling their own needs and do not acquire knowledge wisely. Furthermore, a nation’s image and overall growth rate are drastically decreased compared to those of other nations.
In the modern era, the government should take half the cost of services from individuals, as authorised authorities are aware of citizens’ financial earnings, individuals also know their capacity to earn, and the ruling body must govern the nation in a balanced way.
To conclude, while free healthcare can create reliance on government services and impact economic growth, it ensures access for those in need. However, requiring payment may encourage recognition of the value of services. Overall, the essay argues that a balanced approach to healthcare funding may be most effective for both individuals and society.